Income Tax

Prescribed class of persons for the purpose of section 50CA. New Rule 11UAD

Prescribed class of persons for the purpose of section 50CA. Rule 11UAD. Section 50CA not to apply to transfer of unquoted shares of company/subsidiary
 
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
(CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES)

Notification No. 42/2020

New Delhi, the 30th June, 2020
 
G.S.R.423(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by section 50CA read with section 295 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Board of Direct Taxes hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Income-tax Rules,1962, namely:─
 
1. Short title and commencement.‒(1) These rules may be called the Income-tax (15th Amendment) Rules, 2020.
 
(2) They shall come into force from the 1st day of April, 2020 and shall be applicable for assessment year 2020-21 and subsequent assessment years.
 
2. In the Income-tax Rules, 1962, after the rule 11UAC, the following rule shall be inserted, namely:—

Prescribed class of persons for the purpose of section 50CA

11UAD. The provisions of section 50CA of the Act shall not apply to transfer of any movable property, being unquoted shares, of a company and its subsidiary and the subsidiary of such subsidiary by an assessee, where,-
 
(i) the Tribunal, on an application moved by the Central Government under section 241 of the Companies Act, 2013, has suspended the Board of Directors of such company and has appointed new directors nominated by the Central Government under section 242 of the said Act; and
 
(ii) share of such company and its subsidiary and the subsidiary of such subsidiary has been transferred pursuant to a resolution plan approved by the Tribunal under section 242 of the Companies Act, 2013 after affording a reasonable opportunity of being heard to the jurisdictional Principal Commissioner or Commissioner.
 
Explanation.-For the purposes of this sub-rule,-
 
(a) a company shall be a subsidiary of another company, if such other company holds more than half in nominal value of the equity share capital of the company;
 
(b) “Tribunal” shall have the same meaning assigned to it in clause (90) of section 2 of the Companies Act, 2013.
 
[F. No.370149/143/2019-TPL]
 
ANKUR GOYAL, Under Secy.
(Tax Policy and Legislation)
 
Explanatory Memorandum:
It is hereby certified that no person is being adversely affected by giving retrospective effect to these rules.Note:The principal rules were published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part-II, Section-3, Sub-section (ii) vide number S.O.969(E), dated the 26th March, 1962 and last amended vide notification number G.S.R 421(E) dated 29th June, 2020.

Download Notification Click Here >>

----------- Similar Posts: -----------
Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Whether seized document is incriminating or not is a findings of fact – High Court

Whether seized document is incriminating or not is definitely a findings of fact – High Court In a recent judgment,…

2 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Interest earned on borrowed funds/unutilized capital subsidy is capital receipts – High Court

Interest earned on borrowed funds/ unutilized capital subsidy are capital receipts In a recent judgment, Hon'ble Guwahati High Court has…

5 hours ago
  • Income Tax

No statutory requirement of pre-deposit for stay of demand under Income Tax Act – HC

There is no statutory requirement of pre-deposit for stay of demand under Income Tax Act - High Court stayed demand  …

23 hours ago
  • ICSI

Engagement of Company Secretaries as Young Professionals at RoC Mumbai and Pune

Engagement of Company Secretaries (CS) as Young Professionals in the Office of Regional Director (WR), Registrar of Companies, Mumbai and…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Applicability of Section 115BBE rws 69, 69A 69C in a case before Settlement Commission

Applicability of provisions of Section 115BBE  read with Section 69, 69A and 69C in a case arising before Settlement Commission…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Jewellery purportedly received from grandparent under Will added as unexplained credits

Addition u/s 68 for jewellery purportedly received on death of grandparent under Will upheld. In a recent judgment, ITAT upheld…

3 days ago