Income Tax

NSDL latest e-TDS TCS RPU Version 6.00 and FVU 9.5 RPU V 1.0 from Tax Year 2026-27 – Download

NSDL latest e-TDS TCS RPU Version 6.0 from FY 2007-08

NSDL has revised the e-TDS TCS RPU utility for preparing of TDS/TCS returns.

e-TDS/TCS RPU version 6.0 for Statement(s) from FY 2007-08 onwards has been released. Also e-TDS/TCS File validation utility (FVU) versions 2.191 for FY 2007-08 to FY 2009-10 and FVU version 9.5 for FY 2010-11 onwards has been released. RPU Version 6.0 is applicable from 1st July 2026

Also -TDS/TCS RPU version 1.0 and FVU Version 1.0 have been released applicable to TDS/TCS Statement(s) pertaining to Tax Year 2026-27 onwards. 

NSDL latest e-TDS TCS RPU Version 6.0 and RPU version 1.00

e-TDS/TCS Return Preparation Utility Ver. 6.0 for Regular & Correction quarterly e-TDS/TCS statements from FY 2007-08  RPU version 6.0 is applicable from 1st July, 2026 

Download RPU version 6.0 Click Here >>

Download Protean e-Gov RPU_e-Tutorial (Version 1.9) >>

File Validation Utility (FVU) version 9.5

FVU version 9.05 is applicable with effect from 01.04.2026 onwards for TDS/TCS statements pertaining to FY 2010-11 onwards and FVU version 2.191 in (applicable for TDS/TCS statements from FY 2007-08 up to FY 2009-10) 

FVU for quarterly e-TDS/TCS statement up to FY 2009-10

e-TDS/TCS FVU.exe (Version 2.191) >>

New Features/Validation >>

TDS/TCS RPU for Tax Year 2026-27

RPU Version 1.0 applicable for filing e-TDS/TCS returns for Tax Year 2026-27 has been released. 

Download RPU version 1.0 Click Here >> 

Features and Validation of RPU version 1.0 Click Here >>

Note: Please download and replace the existing folders with the latest version of FVU and RPU folders available at TIN website. Replacing only the FVU Jar file in the old folder may lead to the rejection of statement at the time of submission of the file

Share

View Comments

  • I am writing to urgently bring to your attention some critical issues I encountered while utilizing the RPU for Quarterly Returns, specifically Version 5.1 for Regular & Correction quarterly e-TDS/TCS statements, accessed from the link provided on your website.

    While preparing Annexure II (Salary Details) for quarter 4 of the financial year 2023-24, I discovered serious deficiencies within the software, particularly concerning the option to opt for taxation under Section 115BAC.

    Upon selecting “No” for opting for taxation u/s 115BAC, I encountered the following significant problems:

    Inability to Enter Deductions: The system does not allow me to input deductions under various sections, including but not limited to:

    Section 80C
    Section 80G
    Section 80TTA
    Deduction under Section 16(ii)
    Deduction under Section 16(iii)
    Deduction under Section 16(ia)

    These deductions are crucial for accurate tax calculations and compliance with legal requirements. The inability to enter them severely compromises the functionality and reliability of the software for users.

    In contrast, when opting for taxation u/s 115BAC as “Yes,” deductions become available, indicating a discrepancy in the software’s behaviour.

    This discrepancy is highly problematic and raises concerns about the accuracy and integrity of the RPU for Quarterly Returns. It not only undermines user confidence but also poses potential legal and financial risks associated with incorrect tax filings.

    Therefore, I urgently request your immediate attention to rectify these defects. It is imperative that the RPU for Quarterly Returns accurately handles all relevant tax deductions and options to ensure compliance and provide users with a seamless experience.

    Furthermore, I urge you to conduct a thorough review of the software to identify any other potential issues or discrepancies and implement necessary fixes promptly. This proactive approach is essential to maintaining the credibility and effectiveness of your software.

    I appreciate your prompt action on this matter and request regular updates on the rectification process. Please do not hesitate to reach out if you require any further information or assistance.

    • Please remember, from AY 2024-25 the New Tax Regime u/s 115BAC is default. So when you opt out from new tax regime and select "yes" the deductions will be available and if you select "no" i.e. you choose new tax regime, deductions will not be available except standard deduction

  • 5.1 rpu utility creats problems while revising tds returns
    New version expected

  • Download RPU version 4.5 not dowloading from this link, showing privacy error while redirecting to the in-nsdl.com website, please help.

  • I am looking for FY2018-19 but Download e-TDS/TCS FVU.exe (Version 6.2) >> and the latest 2.8 is not working.

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Requirement for filing Form 67 for claiming FTC only directory not mandatory – ITAT

Requirement for filing Form 67 for claiming Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) is only directory and not mandatory - ITAT In…

11 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Limitation to invoke power u/s 263 for issues not covered in re-assessment start from original assessment – ITAT

Limitation for invoking revisional jurisdiction u/s 263 with respect to issues not covered in re-assessment would start from the original…

21 hours ago
  • Income Tax

AO not justified in rejecting registered valuer’s report without reference to DVO – ITAT

AO not justified in rejecting registered valuer’s report without making a reference to the DVO - ITAT In a recent…

7 days ago
  • FCRA

FCRA specifies list of 105 purposes to be selected for which registration is applied

FCRA specifies list of purposes to be selected for which registration is applied.  The Ministry of Home Affairs has notified…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

Withholding tax u/s 40(a)(i) not required on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent company

Assessee was not liable to withhold tax at source u/s 40(a)(i) on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent company In a…

1 week ago
  • Government

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App not disproportionate – Delhi High Court

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App under section 69A of IT Act 2000 is not disproportionate - Delhi HC…

2 weeks ago