Income Tax

Prosecution for late deposit of TDS stayed in view of Supreme Court judgment

Prosecution for late deposit of TDS stayed by High Court in view of judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court

In a recent order, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh has stayed the prosecution for late/delayed  deposit of TDS in view of judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court 

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 4016 (2024) (05) HC

In the instant case, Petition under Section 482 of CrPC was filed praying quashing of proceedings at Trial Court and order of cognisance of offence.

The Petitioner were a Private Limited Company and its Managing Director. The accusation against the Petitioner was that they failed to remit/deposit the Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) in to Government account within the time prescribed for FY 2016-17.

A chargesheet was filed against the Petitioners prosecuting them for the offence punishable under section 276C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act).

Before the Hon’ble High Court, the Petitioner relied upon a recent judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court wherein their lordships laid down the principle that there shall not be any penalty leviable under section 271C on merely delay in remittance of TDS after deducting the same by the deductor/assessee. It was also held by the Hon’ble Supreme Court that the consequences of non payment/belated deposit of TDS would be under section 201(1A) and section 276B of the Act.

In view of the above submission, the Hon’ble High Court opined that the matter required examination and accordingly stayed all the proceedings on the file of the Trial Court. 

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Bank

State Bank of India elects four Directors in its Central Board

State Bank of India in its General Meeting of the Shareholders elected four Directors to the Central Board. The meeting…

14 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Declaration of additional income by increasing the WIP was not proper – ITAT

Voluntary declaration of additional income by increasing WIP was not proper, as assessee will take the additional benefit in the…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash payment for purchase of land or property not violation of 269SS or 269T

Cash payment for purchase of land or property cannot be treated as violation of provisions of section 269SS or 269T…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Excel Utility for ITR-1 and ITR-4 available for e-filing for AY 2026-27

Income Tax Department has released excel Utility for e-filing ITR-1 and ITR-4 for AY 2026-27 Excel utilities of ITR-1 and…

4 days ago
  • Insurance

Mediclaim amount not deductible from MACT award under medical expenses – SC

Amount of money received as Mediclaim not deductible from an award passed by MACT under the head of medical expenses.…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT jurisdiction is decided by location of AO passing the impugned order

Location of the assessing officer who passed the order shall decide the jurisdiction of the Bench of the Tribunal In…

5 days ago