IWG report to RBI-Large NBFCs may be converted into banks, promoters stake can be increased in bank 

IWG submits report to RBI. Large NBFCs may be converted into banks, promoters’ stake can be increased in bank 

Reserve Bank of India (RBI) had constituted an Internal Working Group (IWG) to review extant ownership guidelines and corporate structure for Indian private sector banks.

The Terms of Reference of the IWG inter alia included review of the eligibility criteria for individuals/ entities to apply for banking license; examination of preferred corporate structure for banks and harmonisation of norms in this regard; and, review of norms for long-term shareholding in banks by the promoters and other shareholders.

The key recommendations of the IWG report are as follows:

1. The cap on promoters’ stake in the long run (15 years) may be raised from the current level of 15 per cent to 26 per cent of the paid-up voting equity share capital of the bank.

2. As regards non-promoter shareholding, a uniform cap of 15 per cent of the paid-up voting equity share capital of the bank may be prescribed for all types of shareholders.

3. Large corporate/industrial houses may be allowed as promoters of banks only after necessary amendments to the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (to prevent connected lending and exposures between the banks and other financial and non-financial group entities); and strengthening of the supervisory mechanism for large conglomerates, including consolidated supervision.

4. Well run large Non-banking Finance Companies (NBFCs), with an asset size of ₹ 50,000 crore and above, including those which are owned by a corporate house, may be considered for conversion into banks subject to completion of 10 years of operations and meeting due diligence criteria and compliance with additional conditions specified in this regard.

5. For Payments Banks intending to convert to a Small Finance Bank, track record of 3 years of experience as Payments Bank may be considered as sufficient.

6. Small Finance Banks and Payments Banks may be listed within ‘6 years from the date of reaching net worth equivalent to prevalent entry capital requirement prescribed for universal banks’ or ‘10 years from the date of commencement of operations’, whichever is earlier.

7. The minimum initial capital requirement for licensing new banks should be enhanced from ₹500 crore to ₹1000 crore for universal banks, and from ₹200 crore to ₹300 crore for small finance banks.

8. Non-operative Financial Holding Company (NOFHC) should continue to be the preferred structure for all new licenses to be issued for universal banks. However, it should be mandatory only in cases where the individual promoters / promoting entities/ converting entities have other group entities.

9. While banks licensed before 2013 may move to an NOFHC structure at their discretion, once the NOFHC structure attains a tax-neutral status, all banks licensed before 2013 shall move to the NOFHC structure within 5 years from announcement of tax-neutrality.

10. Till the NOFHC structure is made feasible and operational, the concerns with regard to banks undertaking different activities through subsidiaries/ Joint Ventures/ associates need to be addressed through suitable regulations.

11. Banks currently under NOFHC structure may be allowed to exit from such a structure if they do not have other group entities in their fold.

12. Reserve Bank may take steps to ensure harmonisation and uniformity in different licensing guidelines, to the extent possible. Whenever new licensing guidelines are issued, if new rules are more relaxed, benefit should be given to existing banks, and if new rules are tougher, legacy banks should also conform to new tighter regulations, but a non-disruptive transition path may be provided to affected banks.

Public Comments on the said report may be submitted by January 15, 2021 through email. 

Read IWG Report Click Here >>

• Section 148 of it Act after 01.04.2021, not require recording reason to believe
• Income Tax Deptt. Lucknow to hire Young Professional for assisting before ITAT
• Burden of proof on assessee to adduce evidence that land sold is agricultural
• Civil Court decreed refund of FD given as security deposit for registration in VAT era
• Pursuing rectification u/s 154 is reasonable cause for condonation of delay in filing appeal