SEBI

Order to stock broker by WhatsApp are legally verifiable record – SEBI

Order to stock broker through WhatsApp may be considered as legally verifiable record – SEBI

SEBI in an informal guidance has stated that order to stock broker through WhatsApp from the registered mobile number of the clients may be considered as legally verifiable record.

SEBI had issued circular No. CIR/HO/MIRSD/MIRSD2/CIR/P/2017/108 on September 06, 2017 on Unauthorised Trading by stock brokers. The said circular requires brokers to execute trades of clients only after keeping evidence of client placing such order, which could be, inter alia, in the form of a. Physical record written & signed by client, b. Telephone recording, c. Email from authorized email id, d. Log for internet transactions, e. Record of SMS messages, f. Any other legally verifiable record.

In this regard, a stock broker had made a query to SEBI whether log of client communication (chat) on WhatsApp directing dealers to buy or sell shares can be considered as log of internet transactions or record of SMS messages or legally verifiable record as compliance of requirements given in said SEBI Circular

SEBI in its reply has stated that placing the order through WhatsApp communication from the registered mobile number of the clients may be considered as legally verifiable record provided that the records/logs maintained by the broker are retrievable and legally verifiable for the purpose of any investigation or legal proceedings. In case of a dispute, the brokers shall establish the verifiability of such communication in accordance with law applicable for electronic evidence and also comply with other applicable provisions of the Master Circular.

Read SEBI Guidance Letter Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Penalty u/s 270A deleted as assessee filed revised computation during scrutiny

Penalty u/s 270A deleted as assesse filed revised computation during scrutiny correcting the mistake which was noticed only after the…

4 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Penalty u/s 271B for unfilled column 40 in Tax Audit Report Form 3CD deleted by ITAT

Penalty u/s 271B for unfilled column 40 in Form 3CD related to details regarding turnover, gross profit etc. for previous…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Merely ex-parte rectifying computation without amending assessment order not make it nullity- ITAT

Merely rectifying computation without amending assessment order without notice to assessee does not nullify the entire assessment  - ITAT In…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

Once assessee discharges primary onus, it shifts to AO to bring evidence to contrary – ITAT

Once assessee discharges primary onus of providing basic documents in support of the identity, genuineness and the creditworthiness it shifts…

7 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cost Inflation Index for FY/Tax Year 2026-27 notified by CBDT. See Up-to-date Table of CII

CBDT has notified Cost Inflation Index for Financial Year / Tax Year 2026-27 CBDT has notified "384" as Cost Inflation…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

Power of CIT(A) u/s 251(1)(a) to remand case can be exercised only in best judgment assessment

Power of CIT(A) under section 251(1)(a) to remand case could be exercised only when the assessment is passed u/s 144…

1 week ago