SEBI

Order to stock broker by WhatsApp are legally verifiable record – SEBI

Order to stock broker through WhatsApp may be considered as legally verifiable record – SEBI

SEBI in an informal guidance has stated that order to stock broker through WhatsApp from the registered mobile number of the clients may be considered as legally verifiable record.

SEBI had issued circular No. CIR/HO/MIRSD/MIRSD2/CIR/P/2017/108 on September 06, 2017 on Unauthorised Trading by stock brokers. The said circular requires brokers to execute trades of clients only after keeping evidence of client placing such order, which could be, inter alia, in the form of a. Physical record written & signed by client, b. Telephone recording, c. Email from authorized email id, d. Log for internet transactions, e. Record of SMS messages, f. Any other legally verifiable record.

In this regard, a stock broker had made a query to SEBI whether log of client communication (chat) on WhatsApp directing dealers to buy or sell shares can be considered as log of internet transactions or record of SMS messages or legally verifiable record as compliance of requirements given in said SEBI Circular

SEBI in its reply has stated that placing the order through WhatsApp communication from the registered mobile number of the clients may be considered as legally verifiable record provided that the records/logs maintained by the broker are retrievable and legally verifiable for the purpose of any investigation or legal proceedings. In case of a dispute, the brokers shall establish the verifiability of such communication in accordance with law applicable for electronic evidence and also comply with other applicable provisions of the Master Circular.

Read SEBI Guidance Letter Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • ICAI

CA Misconduct – Order quashed as judgment not passed by same members who heard arguments.

CA Misconduct – Appellate order quashed as final judgment was not passed by same members who heard arguments. In a…

10 hours ago
  • Insurance

Deceased homemaker can not be considered as dependant for award of compensation under MV Act – SC

Deceased homemaker can not be considered as dependant for award of compensation under MV Act. Courts to award a composite…

16 hours ago
  • Income Tax

CIT notice u/s 263 quashed as AO rightly took DVO value of property as actual sale price

CIT Revision notice u/s 263 quashed as the Assessing Officer rightly taken DVO value of property sold as actual sale…

2 days ago
  • GST

Extension of timeline for implementation of Ship To GSTIN & Voluntary Closure of E-Way Bill functionalities

Extension of timeline for implementation of mandatory "Ship To GSTIN" and Voluntary Closure of E-Way Bill functionalities GSTN Advisory dated…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

No protective addition required when additions is confirmed in hands of searched person – ITAT

No protective addition required in the hand of a third party when additions have been confirmed in the hands of…

3 days ago
  • arbitration

Limitation u/s 34 of Arbitration Act commences on disposal of application u/s 33 by Arbitral Tribunal – SC

Limitation for filing application u/s 34 of Arbitration Act commence from date on which application u/s 33 is disposed of…

1 week ago