Excise/Custom

Third Party Invoicing in case of Preferential Certificates of Origin issued for wholly obtained goods

Third Party Invoicing in case of Preferential Certificates of Origin issued in terms of DFTP for “wholly obtained goods

Circular No. 53/2020 – Customs

F. No. 21000/11/2013-Director(ICD)
Government of India

Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
International Customs Division

Room No. 227A, North Block, New Delhi -110001

Dated: 8th December, 2020

To
The Principal Chief Commissioner / Chief Commissioner of Customs, Ahmedabad/Bengaluru/Chennai/Delhi/Kolkata/Mumbai—I/Mumbai—II/Mumbai—III Zone. The Principal Chief Commissioner / Chief Commissioner of Customs (Preventive), Delhi/Patna/Tiruchirapalli.
The Principal Chief Commissioner / Chief Commissioner ofCentral Goods and Service Tax, Bhopal/ Bhubaneshwar/Guwahati/Hyderabad/Meerut/Nagpur/ Pune/Thiruvananthpuram/Visakhapatnam.

Madam / Sir,

Subject: Third Party Invoicing in case of Preferential Certificates of Origin issued in terms of DFTP for “wholly obtained goods”-regarding

The Board has received representations from trade with regard to use of third party invoicing while claiming preferential tariff treatment in terms of Duty Free Tariff Preference Scheme for Least Developed Countries (DFTP) in respect of “wholly obtained goods”.

2. It has been learnt that Certificates of Origin (CODs) issued in terms of customs notification no 29/2015-cus (N.T), dated 10.03.2015and with third party invoicing were earlier being accepted by the proper officer but that same has been discontinued after implementation of CAROTAR,

3. The matter has been examined. The notification no 29/2015-cus (N.T), dated 10.03.2015 is silent upon provisions for third party invoicing, i.e. commercial invoice for goods originating in the LDC is issued in the third country and not by the consignor in the exporting country. In some other notified preferential rules of origin, where specific provision for third party invoicing is provided, the origin of the good is nonetheless based upon the value addition done in the country of origin alone, with Free on Board (FoB) in country of origin being the base for arriving at the local value content.

4. With regard to notification no 29/2015-cus (N.T), read with notification no. 96/2008-Cus, dated 13.08.2008, which offers unilateral tariff concessions to LDC, the Board is of the view that where value of goods does not have impact on the originating status, i.e the originating criteria is ‘wholly obtained’, the Certificate of Origin issued in terms of Duty Free Tariff Preference Scheme for Least Developed Countries with third party commercial invoice may be accepted. This is subject to ensuring that the goods referred to in the Certificate of Origin, and the invoice correspond to each other and that the goods satisfy the applicable rules of origin. The normal due diligence to check for authenticity of COO and correctness of claim should continue to be observed. Needless to state the existing stipulation of RBI in regard to third party invoicing, would apply.

5. It is requested that necessary public notice may be issued in this regard.

Yours faithfully,

(Abhishek Kumar Sharma)
Senior Technical Officer (ICD)

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

AO took a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat was 25 lakh – ITAT

Assessing Officer had taken a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat/text message was 25 lakh - ITAT…

7 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Shareholders can’t be taxed for income from properties owned by the company – HC

Shareholders are only owners of the shares of the company therefore, income from properties earned by the company cannot be…

9 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Jurisdictional error in reassessment approval can’t be shielded by the law of limitation

When approval for reassessment was granted by unauthorised authority, such jurisdictional error cannot be shielded by the law of limitation…

11 hours ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT ought to remanded whole matter of bogus purchases instead of profit determination

ITAT on presumption of bogus purchases ought to have remanded case to AO to reconsider the whole matter instead of…

12 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Where proceedings u/s 153C barred by limitation, AO can’t invoke section 148 & 148A

Where proceedings u/s 153C are barred by limitation, AO can not reopen the case invoking section 148 and 148A of…

1 day ago
  • bankruptcy

Corporate guarantees executed by corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC

Corporate guarantees executed by the corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC and banks to be recognized as financial creditors…

1 day ago