Income Tax

Assessment Order without digital or manual signature is non-est and illegal

Assessment Order without digital or manual signature is non-est and illegal

In a recent judgment, Delhi ITAT has held that an Assessment Order without digital or manual signature is non-est and illegal

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
5154 (2026) (05) abacus.in ITAT

Important Case Laws relied upon by Parties

In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the Final Assessment order passed u/s 143(3) r.w. Section 144C(13) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘Act’).

Before the Tribunal the assessee submitted that the impugned assessment order deserved to be quashed as there was no signature either digital or manual found in the Final Assessment Order.  Thus, it was submitted that the impugned assessment order is unauthenticated, therefore, the same was in violation and non-est and deserved to be set aside.

The Tribunal observed that the Assessment Order did not contain the signature of the officer who passed the said assessment order.  

The Tribunal further observed that an identical situation came up for consideration by the Co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal

The Co-ordinate Bench observed that signing of an assessment order by the Assessing Officer is a mandatory requirement and not merely a procedural formality. Unless, the order is signed it cannot be said to be complete. Once the order is signed digitally or manually, as required, the order is complete and the date of signature on the order shall be the date of passing of the order.

It was held that non singing of an assessment order is not a procedure flaw that can be cured subsequently after service of the same on the Assessee.  Thus, it was held that such Assessment Order becomes non-est and invalid. 

Following the decision of the Co-ordinate Bench, the Tribunal held that the unsigned impugned Assessment Order is a non-est and the same is illegal. 

Accordingly, the impugned assessment order was quashed.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Penalty u/s 270A deleted as assessee filed revised computation during scrutiny

Penalty u/s 270A deleted as assesse filed revised computation during scrutiny correcting the mistake which was noticed only after the…

15 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Penalty u/s 271B for unfilled column 40 in Tax Audit Report Form 3CD deleted by ITAT

Penalty u/s 271B for unfilled column 40 in Form 3CD related to details regarding turnover, gross profit etc. for previous…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Merely ex-parte rectifying computation without amending assessment order not make it nullity- ITAT

Merely rectifying computation without amending assessment order without notice to assessee does not nullify the entire assessment  - ITAT In…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

Once assessee discharges primary onus, it shifts to AO to bring evidence to contrary – ITAT

Once assessee discharges primary onus of providing basic documents in support of the identity, genuineness and the creditworthiness it shifts…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

Cost Inflation Index for FY/Tax Year 2026-27 notified by CBDT. See Up-to-date Table of CII

CBDT has notified Cost Inflation Index for Financial Year / Tax Year 2026-27 CBDT has notified "384" as Cost Inflation…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

Power of CIT(A) u/s 251(1)(a) to remand case can be exercised only in best judgment assessment

Power of CIT(A) under section 251(1)(a) to remand case could be exercised only when the assessment is passed u/s 144…

1 week ago