Income accumulated us 11(2) not deemed income when transferred from capital fund – ITAT

Income accumulated us 11(2) not deemed income when transferred from capital fund account to the income and expenditure account for utilisation within time allowed u/s 11(3)(c)-ITAT

The instant appeal was preferred by the Revenue against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in deleting the addition of deemed income made by the Assessing Officer (AO) under provision of section 11(3)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) holding that the accumulated income was utilized in accordance with the provisions of the Act

ABCAUS Case Law Citation
ABCAUS 2353 (2018) 06 ITAT

The respondent assessee was a trust engaged in educational activity. The assessee for an Assessment Year accumulated income u/s 11(2) of the Act by way of filing Form 10 for 5 years. This accumulated sum was to be utilized for the purchase of fixed asset and/or for adjustment in fee structure.

However, the assessee utilized the same in the financial year corresponding to AY after the expiry of five years. The Assessee transferred the accumulated amount from its capital fund account to the income and expenditure account and claimed deduction for the same under section 11(3)(c) of the Act.

However, the AO was of the view that the amount transferred from capital fund to income and expenditure account represented the deemed income of the assessee and therefore, such deemed income cannot be eligible u/s 11 of the Act.

Besides, the AO was also of the view that the fund accumulated was to be utilized within 5 years and the assessee had failed to utilize the same within the specified time period. In view of the fact that the assessee had utilized the accumulated fund in the subsequent financial year, (which was under consideration). Thus, according to the AO the assessee had failed to comply the provision of Section 11(2) of the Act.

On issue of show cause by the assessee, the assessee submitted that the provision of Section 11(3)(c) of the Act requires to utilize the accumulated fund within the specified period or in the year immediately following the expiry thereof. In the instance case, the fund was accumulated for 5 years, and was utilized for the specified purposes immediately in the next financial year as permitted under clause (c) of Section 11(3) of the Act.

However, the AO disregarded the contention of the assessee on account of two reasons, firstly, transfer of amount from capital fund to the income and expenditure account which according to him represented the deemed income of the assessee and therefore, was not eligible for deduction u/s 11 of the Act.

Secondly, the fund accumulated set apart was not utilized within the specified time i.e. 5 years. Accordingly, the AO treated the amount as deemed income and added to the total income of the assessee.

The CIT(A) after considering the submission of the assessee deleted the addition made by the AO.

The Tribunal observed that the provisions of Section 11(2) of the Act clearly authorize the assessee to accumulate the fund for the specific purpose for the specified period. In the instant case, there was no allegation of the AO that the fund accumulated had been utilized other than the purpose for which it was accumulated. Therefore, it could be inferred that the fund accumulated had been utilized for the specified purposes. Therefore, there was no question of treating the deemed income of the assessee

The ITAT held that the AO erred in treating the income transfer from capital fund account to the income and expenditure account as deemed income of the assessee.  

Similarly, it was noted that assessee was to utilize the fund within the period of 5 years, which had expired and the assessee having failed to do so, utilized the same for specified purpose in the immediate succeeding financial year.

It was noted that the provisions of Section 11(3)(c) of the Act clearly permits to utilize the funds either within the specified period or in the next year immediately following the expiry of the period of accumulation.

Therefore, the ITAT held that there was no doubt that the assessee was entitled for claiming the deduction u/s 11 of the Act.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • ICAI

Empanelment of ICAI Exam observer for January 2027 Examinations. Last date: 20.11.2026

Empanelment to act as ICAI exam observers for January 2027 CA Examination. Last date to apply is 20.11.2026 Empanelment of…

2 days ago
  • GST

No arrest under GST- Major decision of 57th Meeting of GST Council held on 8th October 2026

No arrest under GST- Major decision taken in 57th Meeting of the GST Council on 8th October 2026 PRESS RELEASE…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Later SC ruling cannot render an act done in compliance of a court order a statutory default

A subsequent Apex Court ruling on the substantive issue cannot retrospectively make an act done in compliance of a binding…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Interest payment on mobilisation advance to NHAI not liable to TDS u/s 194A

Interest payment on mobilisation advance to NHAI not liable for deduction of tax at source u/s 194A - ITAT Interest…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

Typographical error in turnover accepted during assessment not a mistake apparent from record

Typographical error in turnover declared in ITR was not as a mistake apparent from the record u/s 154 when AO…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

Plea that assessee was not aware of order cannot be brushed aside in absence of proof of service

Ground taken by assessee that he was not aware of the order cannot be brushed aside so lightly in absence…

7 days ago