Income Tax

Unspent amount of donations shown as current liabilities not income if received with stipulation to their use – HC

Unspent amount of donations shown as current liabilities not income if received with stipulation to their use by the Charitable Trust-High Court

ABCAUS Case Law Citation
ABCAUS 2377 (2018) 06 HC

The instant appeal was filed by the Revenue u/s 260-A of the Income Tax Act 1961against the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The substantial question of law  raised was as to whether donations received by the respondent assessee in the mid of the Financial Year with the stipulation from the donors that part of the said money may be utilized for the specified charitable purpose in the next financial year can be treated as the income for year of receipt of the donation or not?

The assessee was a Charitable Trust. During the middle of the financial year, it had received donation with specific stipulation from the donor regarding its use over a period of time which spread over to more than one year.

Accordingly, the assessee had treated the donation as income of the year only to the extent to it was utilised during the year under consideration. Rest of the

donation amount had been shown as unearned income grouped under “current liabilities” in the balance sheet being the proportionate amount to be utilized in the subsequent year .

However, the Assessing Officer (AO) denied the claim of the assessee and treated the whole amount of fonation as income for the relevant assessment year.

The CIT(A) held in favour of the assessee.

The Tribunal  observed that the Assessing Officer had denied the claim of the

Assessee without disputing that the donations in question had been received with stipulation regarding its use over a period of time.

The ITAT opined that when the donations was received in the mid of the financial year and the same was to be used over a further period of 12 months then only half of the donations to be used for the year under consideration and the balance half of the donation to be used in the next financial year.

It was observed that the donation received with a stipulation to be used over a period of time extending into succeeding year cannot be treated the income of the year under consideration alone but it had to be divided in proportion as per its use over the period of time spreading over the year under consideration and subsequent year. Hence the part of the donation was treated as income by the assessee in the year in which the obligation to spend the amount had been conditioned by the donor with a stipulation regarding the use over a period of time.

The Tribunal observed that when the assessee was complying with the specific condition of utilizing the amount of donation for a particular purpose and for a particular period of time, then it could not be given a different treatment which is contrary to the conditions of donation. Therefore the treatment given by the assessee was proper and as per the conservative accounting policy.

The Tribunal held that the donation which pertained and to be used and spent

during the next Financial Year cannot be treated as the income of the year under consideration when there was a specific condition stipulated by the donor.

The Hon’ble High Court observed that both the Appellate Authorities had concurrently held in favour of the respondent-assessee that the unspent amount of donations to be spent in the next financial year had been rightly described as

“current liabilities” and therefore, cannot be treated as income.

The Hon’ble High Court opined that findings and reasons assigned by the two Appellate Authorities below in this regard were justified and in accordance with the consistent accounting practice followed by the assessee. Accordingly the appeal was dismissed.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

AO took a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat was 25 lakh – ITAT

Assessing Officer had taken a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat/text message was 25 lakh - ITAT…

4 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Shareholders can’t be taxed for income from properties owned by the company – HC

Shareholders are only owners of the shares of the company therefore, income from properties earned by the company cannot be…

6 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Jurisdictional error in reassessment approval can’t be shielded by the law of limitation

When approval for reassessment was granted by unauthorised authority, such jurisdictional error cannot be shielded by the law of limitation…

9 hours ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT ought to remanded whole matter of bogus purchases instead of profit determination

ITAT on presumption of bogus purchases ought to have remanded case to AO to reconsider the whole matter instead of…

9 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Where proceedings u/s 153C barred by limitation, AO can’t invoke section 148 & 148A

Where proceedings u/s 153C are barred by limitation, AO can not reopen the case invoking section 148 and 148A of…

1 day ago
  • bankruptcy

Corporate guarantees executed by corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC

Corporate guarantees executed by the corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC and banks to be recognized as financial creditors…

1 day ago