arbitration

Arbitration award induced/effected by fraud/corruption can be stayed.

Arbitration award if induced or effected by fraud or corruption can be stayed. Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act 2021
 
MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE
(Legislative Department)
 
New Delhi, the 11th March, 2021
 
The following Act of Parliament received the assent of the President on the11th March, 2021, and is hereby published for general information:—

THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2021 NO. 3 OF 2021

[11th March, 2021.]
 
An Act further to amend the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
 
BE it enacted by Parliament in the Seventy-second Year of the Republic of India as follows:––
 
1.Short title and commencement (1) This Act may be called the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2021.
 
(2) Save as otherwise provided in this Act, it shall be deemed to have come into force on the 4th day of November, 2020.
 
Amendment of section 36
2. In the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the principal Act), in section 36, in sub-section (3), after the proviso, the following shall be inserted and shall be deemed to have been inserted with effect from the 23rd day of October, 2015, namely:
 
“Provided further that where the Court is satisfied that a prima facie case is made out that,—
 
(a) the arbitration agreement or contract which is the basis of the award; or
 
(b) the making of the award,
 
was induced or effected by fraud or corruption, it shall stay the award unconditionally pending disposal of the challenge under section 34 to the award.
 
Explanation.––For the removal of doubts, it is hereby clarified that the above proviso shall apply to all court cases arising out of or in relation to arbitral proceedings, irrespective of whether the arbitral or court proceedings were commenced prior to or after the commencement of the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015.”
 
Substitution of new section for section 43J
 
3. For section 43J of the principal Act, the following section shall be substituted, namely:––
 
Norms for accreditation of arbitrator
 
43J. The qualifications, experience and norms for accreditation of arbitrators shall be such as may be specified by the regulations.”
 
Omission of Eighth Schedule
 
4.The Eighth Schedule to the principal Act shall be omitted
 
Repeal and savings
 
5. (1) The Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Ordinance, 2020 is hereby repealed.
 
(2) Notwithstanding such repeal, anything done or any action taken under the said Ordinance shall be deemed to have been done or taken under this Act.
 
DR. G. NARAYANA RAJU,
Secretary to the Govt. of India

Download Notification Click Here >>

 
 
----------- Similar Posts: -----------
Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Whether bank account was fraudulently open in the name of assessee is question of fact

Whether bank account was fraudulently open in the name of assessee is question of fact. High Court declined to entertain…

15 mins ago
  • Concurrent Audit

SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of Chartered Accountant Firms 2024-25. Last date 18.05.2024

SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of Chartered Accountant Firms for FY 2024-25 SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of CA Firms for FY…

2 hours ago
  • Companies Act

Change in the constitution of Appellate Authority for CAs CSs and Cost Accountants

Change in the constitution of Appellate Authority for CAs CSs and Cost Accountants In 2015, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs…

16 hours ago
  • VAT

Trade Tax refund withheld beyond stipulated period & adjusted from demand unjustified – SC

Trade Tax Department was unjustified in retaining refund beyond stipulated period and adjusting it against default notices issued subsequently. In…

16 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Notice issued u/s 143(2) prior to filing of return of income assessee is invalid

Notice issued u/s 143(2) prior to filing of return of income by the assessee was invalid. Before filing ITR provisions…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Order u/s 148A(d) passed against non-existent entity is bad in eyes of law – High Court

Order u/s 148A(d) passed against non-existent entity is bad in eyes of law. Mere activation of PAN not give right…

2 days ago