bankruptcy

IBC-2016 to apply to personal guarantors to corporate debtors. Persons ineligible to be resolution applicant

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 to apply to personal guarantors to corporate debtors. Wilful defaulter, NPA Account holders, disqualified directors not eligible to be resolution applicant.

The Government has notified the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Act, 2017 retrospectively and it shall be deemed to have come into force on the 23rd day of November, 2017.

Persons not eligible to be resolution applicant

A new section 29A has been inserted specifying persons not eligible to be resolution applicant. As per the newly added section, the following persons shall not be eligible to submit a resolution plan:

(a) An undischarged insolvent;

(b) A wilful defaulter 

(c) Holder of a loan account classified as non-performing asset (NPA)

(d) Those convicted for any offence punishable with imprisonment for two years or more

(e) Disqualified to act as a director under the Companies Act, 2013

(f) Prohibited by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) from trading in securities or accessing the securities markets;

(g) Promoter/connected corporate debtor in which a preferential transaction, undervalued transaction, extortionate credit transaction or fraudulent transaction has taken place and in respect of which an order has been made by the Adjudicating Authority under the Code.

(h) One who has executed an enforceable guarantee in favour of a creditor in respect of a corporate debtor against which an application for insolvency resolution made by such creditor has been admitted under the Code.

(i) The one who has been subject to any disability, corresponding to clauses (a) to (h) above, under any law in a jurisdiction outside India; or

(j) Connected person not eligible under clauses (a) to (i).

Download The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Act, 2017 Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST – case remanded for determination In a recent…

2 days ago
  • ICAI

CA Misconduct – Order quashed as judgment not passed by same members who heard arguments.

CA Misconduct – Appellate order quashed as final judgment was not passed by same members who heard arguments. In a…

4 days ago
  • Insurance

Deceased homemaker can not be considered as dependant for award of compensation under MV Act – SC

Deceased homemaker can not be considered as dependant for award of compensation under MV Act. Courts to award a composite…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

CIT notice u/s 263 quashed as AO rightly took DVO value of property as actual sale price

CIT Revision notice u/s 263 quashed as the Assessing Officer rightly taken DVO value of property sold as actual sale…

6 days ago
  • GST

Extension of timeline for implementation of Ship To GSTIN & Voluntary Closure of E-Way Bill functionalities

Extension of timeline for implementation of mandatory "Ship To GSTIN" and Voluntary Closure of E-Way Bill functionalities GSTN Advisory dated…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

No protective addition required when additions is confirmed in hands of searched person – ITAT

No protective addition required in the hand of a third party when additions have been confirmed in the hands of…

7 days ago