bankruptcy

IBC-2016 to apply to personal guarantors to corporate debtors. Persons ineligible to be resolution applicant

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 to apply to personal guarantors to corporate debtors. Wilful defaulter, NPA Account holders, disqualified directors not eligible to be resolution applicant.

The Government has notified the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Act, 2017 retrospectively and it shall be deemed to have come into force on the 23rd day of November, 2017.

Persons not eligible to be resolution applicant

A new section 29A has been inserted specifying persons not eligible to be resolution applicant. As per the newly added section, the following persons shall not be eligible to submit a resolution plan:

(a) An undischarged insolvent;

(b) A wilful defaulter 

(c) Holder of a loan account classified as non-performing asset (NPA)

(d) Those convicted for any offence punishable with imprisonment for two years or more

(e) Disqualified to act as a director under the Companies Act, 2013

(f) Prohibited by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) from trading in securities or accessing the securities markets;

(g) Promoter/connected corporate debtor in which a preferential transaction, undervalued transaction, extortionate credit transaction or fraudulent transaction has taken place and in respect of which an order has been made by the Adjudicating Authority under the Code.

(h) One who has executed an enforceable guarantee in favour of a creditor in respect of a corporate debtor against which an application for insolvency resolution made by such creditor has been admitted under the Code.

(i) The one who has been subject to any disability, corresponding to clauses (a) to (h) above, under any law in a jurisdiction outside India; or

(j) Connected person not eligible under clauses (a) to (i).

Download The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Act, 2017 Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non- payment of cost imposed can’t trigger automatic confirmation of an invalid exparte assessment.

ITAT power to pass such orders "as it thinks fit" implies a judicial discretion to be exercised within the parameters…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

4 days ago
  • ICAI

Last date to submit MEF 2026-27 extended to 09.09.2026

ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

7 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

1 week ago