bankruptcy

Insolvency Professional Entities cannot provide any service to any person – IBBI

Insolvency Professional Entities cannot provide any service to any person. IBBI directs IPEs to refrain from seeking/joining panel of any market participant

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India
7th Floor, Mayur Bhawan, Connaught Place, New Delhi-110001

CIRCULAR

No. IBBI/IPE/014/2018

6th July, 2018

To
All Recognised Insolvency Professional Entities
All Registered Insolvency Professionals
All Registered Insolvency Professional Agencies
(By mail to registered email addresses and on the website of the IBBI)

Dear Madam / Sir,

Sub: Empanelment of Insolvency Professional Entities.

An Insolvency Professional Entity (IPE) is recognised in accordance with regulation 12 (1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Professionals) Regulations, 2016, only if “its sole objective is to provide support services to the insolvency professionals, who are its partners or directors; as the case may be”. Thus, an IPE cannot provide any service to any person. It can provide only support services to the insolvency professionals who are its partners or directors. Thus, the role of IPE is clearly specified.

2. Section 206 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (Code prohibits a person from rendering services as an insolvency professional (IP) unless he is: (a) enrolled as a member of an Insolvency Professional Agency (IPA), and (b) is registered with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI). Thus, no person other than a person registered as an IP with the IBBI can render services as an IP. An IPE is neither enrolled as a member of an IPA nor registered as an IP with the IBBI. It cannot act as IP under the Code.

3. It has come to the notice of the IBBI that a few market participants are seeking empanelment of IPEs and a few IPEs are seeking empanelment with market participants. Given the role of an IPE, the IPEs are, therefore, directed to refrain from seeking or joining any panel of any market participant.

4. This circular is issued in exercise of the powers conferred under clause (a) of sub-section (1) of section 196 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 read with regulation 12 of the IBBI (Insolvency Professional) Regulations, 2016.

Yours faithfully,
(Debajyoti Ray Chaudhuri)
Chief General Manager
Email: dr.chaudhuri@ibbi.gov.in

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

2 days ago
  • ICAI

Last date to submit MEF 2026-27 extended to 09.09.2026

ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

6 days ago