Objective of insolvency code is not realisation of bad loans – IBBI

The objective of IBC 2016 is reorganization and insolvency resolution and not realisation of bad loans- IBBI

In a letter written to “ The Week” the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) has stated that the impression that Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (Code) is for realisation of bad loans is misleading and incorrect.

The letter was written with reference to the article titled “Modi report card: What has BJP govt done to help India’s bleeding banking sector?” by Mr. Soumik Dey, in the 4th April, 2019 edition of ‘The Week’.

The asid article, inter-alia, carried a statement as under:

“The Central Bank of India (CBI) has over Rs 150 billion worth of bad loans, stuck in the realisation process of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India, the insolvency regulator.”

According to the IBBI, The above statement gives two impressions, namely, (a) bad loans of the Central Bank of India are stuck up with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI), the insolvency regulator, and (b) the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (Code) is for realisation of bad loans. Both the impressions are misleading and incorrect as explained in this letter.

The IBBI stated that the IB Code segregates commercial aspects from judicial aspects of an insolvency proceeding and empowers and facilitates the stakeholders and the Adjudicating Authority to take decisions in their respective domain. The IBBI does not have any role in the proceeding. Therefore, the possibility of a proceeding or bad loan getting stuck up with the IBBI does not arise.

Quoting the decisions of the Supreme Court and NCLT , the IBBI has reiterated that rhe objective of the Code is reorganization and insolvency resolution and not realisation of bad loans.

The IBBI has requested “the Week” to publish the said letter  prominently to enable the readers to have a correct perspective. 

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

No disallowance u/s 43B if expenditure not claimed in Profit and Loss Account

No disallowance u/s 43B can be made if expenditure has not been not claimed by the assessee in Profit and…

33 minutes ago
  • Income Tax

Assessee developing infrastructure facility of Govt. not contractor for denying 80IA deduction

Whether an assessee developing an infrastructure facility of Government is a contractor and ineligible for claim of deduction under Section…

22 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Jurisdictional PCIT/CIT to condone delay in filing Form No. 10A for Registration u/s 12A

Jurisdictional Principal Commissioner of Income-tax or Commissioner of Income-tax to condone delay in filing Form No. 10A for Registration u/s…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

AO not justified in making addition by adopting extrapolation without any material evidence

AO was not justified in making addition by adopting method of extrapolation without bringing any material evidence in support -…

2 days ago
  • bankruptcy

Court can not sit over comparative financial attractiveness of rival offers decided by CoC

Court can not sit over comparative financial attractiveness of rival offers or to substitute its own view for the decision…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

When quantum appeal restored, penalty can’t be levied for non-payment of demand

When quantum appeal stands restored to the AO, penalty can not be levied u/s 221(1) of the Income Tax Act…

4 days ago