Objective of insolvency code is not realisation of bad loans – IBBI

The objective of IBC 2016 is reorganization and insolvency resolution and not realisation of bad loans- IBBI

In a letter written to “ The Week” the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) has stated that the impression that Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (Code) is for realisation of bad loans is misleading and incorrect.

The letter was written with reference to the article titled “Modi report card: What has BJP govt done to help India’s bleeding banking sector?” by Mr. Soumik Dey, in the 4th April, 2019 edition of ‘The Week’.

The asid article, inter-alia, carried a statement as under:

“The Central Bank of India (CBI) has over Rs 150 billion worth of bad loans, stuck in the realisation process of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India, the insolvency regulator.”

According to the IBBI, The above statement gives two impressions, namely, (a) bad loans of the Central Bank of India are stuck up with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI), the insolvency regulator, and (b) the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (Code) is for realisation of bad loans. Both the impressions are misleading and incorrect as explained in this letter.

The IBBI stated that the IB Code segregates commercial aspects from judicial aspects of an insolvency proceeding and empowers and facilitates the stakeholders and the Adjudicating Authority to take decisions in their respective domain. The IBBI does not have any role in the proceeding. Therefore, the possibility of a proceeding or bad loan getting stuck up with the IBBI does not arise.

Quoting the decisions of the Supreme Court and NCLT , the IBBI has reiterated that rhe objective of the Code is reorganization and insolvency resolution and not realisation of bad loans.

The IBBI has requested “the Week” to publish the said letter  prominently to enable the readers to have a correct perspective. 

Share

Recent Posts

  • GST

ITC can’t be denied on ground that supplier’s registration was cancelled subsequently

ITC can’t be denied on ground that supplier’s registration was cancelled subsequently when supplier had filed GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B for…

12 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Amount of Rs. 6 lakh claimed as gift received from parents in law not unreasonably high – ITAT

Amount of Rs. 6 lakh claimed to have been received as gift from parents in law not an excessively or…

13 hours ago
  • GST

GST exemption upheld on renting of residential dwelling as hostel to students & professionals

Assessee was entitled to GST exemption on renting of residential dwelling as hostel to students and working professionals In a…

15 hours ago
  • RBI

RBI increases number of free and basic minimum facilities in BSBD accounts

RBI increases number of basic minimum facilities to be offered in a Basic Savings Bank Deposit (BSBD) account, free of…

17 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Imparting education in gemmology, jewellery arts, designs qualifies for exemption u/s 11

Conducting courses in gemmology, jewellery arts, jewellery design amounts to imparting of education entitling assessee benefit of exemption u/s 11…

20 hours ago
  • GST

Special procedure under Delhi GST Act for rectification of order for wrong ITC availment

Special procedure notified under Delhi GST Act 2017 for rectification of order confirming demand for wrong availment of ITC. Lt.…

22 hours ago