bankruptcy

Understanding the IBC-2016: Analysing developments in jurisprudence

Understanding the IBC-2016: Analysing developments in jurisprudence-Release of publication developed by the Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India

No. IBBI/PR/2019/16
9th June, 2019

Press Release

Release of publication ‘Understanding the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Analysing developments in jurisprudence’.

Hon’ble Mr. Justice M. M. Kumar, President, National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) released a publication titled ‘Understanding the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Analysing developments in jurisprudence’, jointly prepared by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India and Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy. This tracks legislative and judicial developments on fifteen select issues that have been heavily litigated and provides settled legal position along with the rationale for the same. The publication is available at www.ibbi.gov.in The release of the publication was followed by a Roundtable Discussion on ‘Legal developments and challenges under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016’.

2. In his address on the occasion, Mr. Justice Kumar emphasised the need for creating awareness among the stakeholders on the legal issues emanating from the Code. He expressed satisfaction over settlement of several such issues in the last two years. He urged the committee of creditors (CoC) to act with diligence and care in the interest of all stakeholders and strive for revival and rehabilitation of the corporate debtor undergoing corporate insolvency resolution process. Mr. Justice Kumar called for higher engagement of the Insolvency Professional Agencies in development and regulation of insolvency professionals.

3. Dr. M. S. Sahoo, Chairperson, IBBI explained that the Code aims at improving availability of credit and thereby availability of all forms of credit, including bank loan, non-bank loan, corporate debt, secured credit, unsecured credit, etc. The corporate finance is dominated by secured loans from banks today, because of the protection available under the law for such credit. If the Code grants excessive protection to one kind of credit, the market of that category of credit may expand while market for all other categories may disappear. This may not be consistent with the objective of the Code.

4. The distinguished panellists at the Roundtable included: Dr. T. K. Viswanathan, Chairman, Bankruptcy Law Reforms Committee; Mr. Suharsh Sinha, Partner, AZB & Partners, Advocates & Solicitors; Mr. Uday Khare, Partner, Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas; Mr. Nilanjan Sinha, Head (Legal), ICICI Bank; Ms. Nitu Poddar, Senior Associate Vinod Kothari & Company; Ms. Swarupama Chaturvedi, Advocate; Ms. Anjali Anchayil, Senior Associate, JSA; and Ms. Shreya Parkash, Research Fellow, Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy.

Download Publication Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Government

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App not disproportionate – Delhi High Court

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App under section 69A of IT Act 2000 is not disproportionate - Delhi HC…

18 hours ago
  • Income Tax

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA to means a project or an undertaking owned…

21 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash not owner who came up to own it

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash…

3 days ago
  • RTI

Lokayukta Police not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005 – SC

Lokayukta Police not an ‘intelligence and security’ organisation  and hence not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST – case remanded for determination In a recent…

1 week ago
  • ICAI

CA Misconduct – Order quashed as judgment not passed by same members who heard arguments.

CA Misconduct – Appellate order quashed as final judgment was not passed by same members who heard arguments. In a…

1 week ago