Brexit

FRC UK Statement on the referendum vote to leave EU – Our regulatory framework is unchanged and we will continue to apply it.

FRC UK statement following the referendum vote to leave EU

24 Jun 2016

“Stakeholders have asked about the implications of the referendum result for our regulatory work. Our regulatory framework is unchanged and we will continue to apply it. The FRC will also continue to play its part in representing the interests of the UK internationally. We will pay close attention to the decisions now taken by the Government and Parliament, and continue to work in collaboration with our key stakeholders, particularly investors, business and the professionals we regulate, in order to ensure our work continues to support economic growth.”
 
Note:
The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) is the UK’s and the Republic of Ireland’s independent regulator responsible for promoting high quality corporate governance. The FRC incorporates six operating bodies. The FRC set standards for corporate reporting, audit and actuarial practice and monitor and enforce accounting and auditing standards. It also oversee the regulatory activities of the actuarial profession and the professional accountancy bodies and operate independent enforcement arrangements for public interest cases involving accountants and actuaries in the UK and the Republic of Ireland. The six operating bodies of FRC are as under:
1. Accounting Standards Board (ASB)
2. Financial Reporting Review Panel (FRRP)
3. Accountancy & Actuarial Discipline Board (AADB)
4. Professional Oversight Board (POB)
5. Auditing Practices Board (APB), and
6. Board for Actuarial Standards
 

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Not making available material forming basis of reopening shows AO had prejudged the issue

AO stating that material forming basis of reopening shall be disclosed at the stage of assessment/re-assessment, indicates that the AO…

5 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Reopening conclusion that assessee was “Non-Filer” was non-application of mind – High Court

Reopening conclusion that assessee was “Non-Filer” despite assessee clearly stating in reply that he had filed ITR was non-application of…

6 hours ago
  • Income Tax

HC declined to allow voluminous documents physically in Faceless Assessment

High Court declined to allow production of physical documents by in Faceless Assessment simply because they were voluminous In a…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Prima facie satisfaction u/s 148 can not be a non-existing or incorrect information

The prima facie satisfaction u/s 148 cannot be stretched to a non-existing information or incorrect information - ITAT In a…

2 days ago
  • SEBI

Mutual Funds to value physical Gold and Silver by using the polled spot prices

Mutual Funds to value physical Gold and Silver by using the polled spot prices published by the recognized stock exchanges…

2 days ago
  • bankruptcy

SC allows simultaneous CIRP proceedings against principal debtor & corporate guarantor

Supreme Court allows simultaneous CIRP proceedings against principal debtor and its corporate guarantor, declines to frame any guidelines In a…

3 days ago