Judgments

  • Income Tax

If foundational addition is deleted other addition can not stand – ITAT

If foundational addition is deleted other addition can not stand. CIT(A) cannot do what AO could not have done in…

7 years ago
  • Income Tax

Exemption us 54F available if investment made before time allowed us 139(4) – ITAT

Exemption us 54F-if investment made before time allowed us 139(4) for filing of belated return. ITAT allowed exemption follwoing High…

7 years ago
  • Service Tax

Chit fund business not cash or fund management for service tax levy purpose – Supreme Court

Chit fund business not cash or fund management for service tax levy purpose. Chit fund not covered u/s 12 of…

7 years ago
  • Income Tax

Penalty u/s 221(1)-Interest component has to be excluded while levying Penalty. “tax in arrears” not include interest -Bombay HC

Penalty u/s 221(1)-Interest component has to be excluded while levying Penalty. The term "tax in arrears" does not include interest…

7 years ago
  • Income Tax

Penalty us 271(1)(c) invoking discretionary jurisdiction us 40A(2)(b) invalid – Allahabad High Court

Penalty us 271(1)(c) invoking discretionary jurisdiction us 40A(2)(b) invalid. Income assessed on the basis of deeming provisions would not amount to…

7 years ago
  • Income Tax

Deduction claim against LIC Incentive bonus admissible up to 30% from 01.04.1989 -ITAT

Deduction claim against LIC Incentive admissible up to 30 percent. From 01.04.1989  Development Officers entitled for reimbursement to the extent…

7 years ago
  • EPFO

Provisions of the Limitation Act not applicable to EPF & MP Act in the abscence of any legislative intent – High Court

Provisions of the Limitation Act not applicable to EPF & MP Act in the abscence of any legislative intent. These Act being Special Social…

7 years ago
  • Income Tax

NPA interest write off-Income Tax Act to override NHB Act – Delhi High Court

NPA interest write off-Income Tax Act to override NHB Act. Deduction for past due interest to be based on 6…

7 years ago
  • Income Tax

CIT erred in rejecting revision application u/s 264 on legal ground, not deciding merits-High Court

CIT erred in rejecting revision application u/s 264 on the ground of maintainability. CIT ought to have entertained the revision…

7 years ago
  • EPFO

P F Commissioner competent to decide employee employer relationship-Kerala High Court

P F Commissioner competent to decide the employee employer relationship and to determine if a particular employee comes under the…

7 years ago