Orders of Supreme Court, High Courts and CESTAT accepted by the CBEC and on which no review petitions, SLPs have been filed.
The Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC/Board) has issued Circular No. 1063/2/2018-CX dated 16.02.2018 on the subject “Orders of Supreme Court, High Courts and CESTAT accepted by the Department & on which no Review Petitions, SLPs have been filed”, in relation to Indirect Taxes.
As per the said circular, as per the practice in vogue, field formations send Special Leave Petitions (SLP) & Civil Appeals (CA) proposals to the Board. Many of the SLP/CA are not approved and such decisions of High Courts & Tribunals attains finality.
The Department has decided to disseminate such information to the field formations as an endeavour to reduce litigations so that cases on similar questions of law or identical case on facts pending in the field can be decided.
The said CBEC Circular compiles 63 Orders accepted by the Department. In 14 of these Orders, High Courts have decided various questions of law. In the rest, High Courts have delivered Judgments on basis of settled case law or decided points of facts or dismissed the appeal on monetary grounds.
The Circular has two parts, namely Part I and Part II, where Part I comprises of the orders of various High Courts in which points of law have been decided and Part II comprises orders which have been decided on facts or have been dismissed on monetary limits. All the orders have been accepted by the Department and against them no SLP etc has been preferred in the Hon’ble Supreme Court.
Non issuance of notice u/s 143(2) for return filed u/s 148 even though belatedly, makes the assessment framed bad in…
Calculation of functional disability depends on assessing the victim’s earning capacity in the open, competitive market – Supreme Court In…
Appeal against every decision of ITAT shall lie only before the High Court within whose jurisdiction the Assessing Officer who…
Supreme Court recommends action against Commissioner of Customs who relied upon non-existent AI generated case laws. Supreme Court recommends action…
ITAT power to pass such orders "as it thinks fit" implies a judicial discretion to be exercised within the parameters…
Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…