Companies Act

AOC4 XBRL to be filed even if company not fall under specified class in succeeding years

AOC4 XBRL to be filed even if the company do not fall under the specified class of companies in succeeding years-MCA Notification

The Government has amended the Companies (Filing of Documents and Forms in Extensible Business Reporting Language) Rules, 2015. MCA has notified the Companies (Filing of Documents and Forms in Extensible Business Reporting Language) Amendment Rules, 2018.

Under the existing Rule 3 the following class of companies (excluding companies in Banking, lnsurance, Power Sector and Non Banking Financial companies ) are required to file their financial statement and other documents under section 137 of the Companies Act, 2013 with the Registrar of Companies (RoC) in e-form AOC-4 XBRL:-

(i) all companies listed with any Stock Exchange(s) in India and their Indian subsidiaries; or

(ii) all companies having paid up capital of rupees five crore or above;

(iii) all companies having turnover of rupees hundred crore or above; or

(iv) all companies which were hitherto covered under the Companies (Filing of Documents and Forms in Extensible Business Reporting Language) Rules, 2011.

It has been now provided that the companies which have filed their financial statements under existing Rule 3 shall continue to file their financial statements and other documents though they may not fall under the class of companies specified therein in succeeding years.

Similarly it has been provided that the companies which have filed their financial statements under the erstwhile rules, namely the Companies (Filing of Documents and Forms in Extensible Business Reporting Language) Rules, 2011, shall continue to file their financial statements and other documents as prescribed in existing rule 3 though they do not fall under the class of companies specified therein.

Download MCA Notification [F. No. 1/19/2013 –CL V] dated 8th March, 2018  Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Order u/s 263 enhancing disallowance quashed as CIT (A) has power of enhancements – ITAT

ITAT quashed order u/s 263 enhancing disallowance observing in appellate proceedings, CIT(A) has power of enhancements of income assessed, if…

9 minutes ago
  • Income Tax

Penalty section cannot be subject matter of revisionary jurisdiction under section 263

Section under which penalty should be initiated cannot be subject matter of revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 of Income Tax…

11 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Related party transaction u/s 40A(2) shall be treated as bona fide, unless evading tax

Related party transaction u/s 40A(2) shall be treated as bona fide, unless AO finds that one of them is trying…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

‘Transfer of property’ not include ‘acquiring’ of property or ‘purchasing’ of property – ITAT

The word ‘transfer of property’ does not include ‘acquiring’ of property or ‘purchasing’ of property and only can be confined…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

AO was not justified in questioning cash withdrawals from bank account – ITAT

AO is not justified in questioning the cash withdrawals from bank account on the ground that the assessee had sufficient…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Return/Balance sheet filed within limitation extended by SC to be considered within time

Return/Balance sheet to be considered as being within time if filed within timeline condoned by Hon'ble Supreme Court due to…

2 days ago