Companies Act

AOC4 XBRL to be filed even if company not fall under specified class in succeeding years

AOC4 XBRL to be filed even if the company do not fall under the specified class of companies in succeeding years-MCA Notification

The Government has amended the Companies (Filing of Documents and Forms in Extensible Business Reporting Language) Rules, 2015. MCA has notified the Companies (Filing of Documents and Forms in Extensible Business Reporting Language) Amendment Rules, 2018.

Under the existing Rule 3 the following class of companies (excluding companies in Banking, lnsurance, Power Sector and Non Banking Financial companies ) are required to file their financial statement and other documents under section 137 of the Companies Act, 2013 with the Registrar of Companies (RoC) in e-form AOC-4 XBRL:-

(i) all companies listed with any Stock Exchange(s) in India and their Indian subsidiaries; or

(ii) all companies having paid up capital of rupees five crore or above;

(iii) all companies having turnover of rupees hundred crore or above; or

(iv) all companies which were hitherto covered under the Companies (Filing of Documents and Forms in Extensible Business Reporting Language) Rules, 2011.

It has been now provided that the companies which have filed their financial statements under existing Rule 3 shall continue to file their financial statements and other documents though they may not fall under the class of companies specified therein in succeeding years.

Similarly it has been provided that the companies which have filed their financial statements under the erstwhile rules, namely the Companies (Filing of Documents and Forms in Extensible Business Reporting Language) Rules, 2011, shall continue to file their financial statements and other documents as prescribed in existing rule 3 though they do not fall under the class of companies specified therein.

Download MCA Notification [F. No. 1/19/2013 –CL V] dated 8th March, 2018  Click Here >>

----------- Similar Posts: -----------
Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

In absence of mala fide intention bank should not be treated as assessee in default

In absence of mala fide intention bank should not be treated as assessee in default for late deduction and deposit…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Whether bank account was fraudulently open in the name of assessee is question of fact

Whether bank account was fraudulently open in the name of assessee is question of fact. High Court declined to entertain…

2 days ago
  • Concurrent Audit

SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of Chartered Accountant Firms 2024-25. Last date 18.05.2024

SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of Chartered Accountant Firms for FY 2024-25 SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of CA Firms for FY…

2 days ago
  • Companies Act

Change in the constitution of Appellate Authority for CAs CSs and Cost Accountants

Change in the constitution of Appellate Authority for CAs CSs and Cost Accountants In 2015, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs…

3 days ago
  • VAT

Trade Tax refund withheld beyond stipulated period & adjusted from demand unjustified – SC

Trade Tax Department was unjustified in retaining refund beyond stipulated period and adjusting it against default notices issued subsequently. In…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Notice issued u/s 143(2) prior to filing of return of income assessee is invalid

Notice issued u/s 143(2) prior to filing of return of income by the assessee was invalid. Before filing ITR provisions…

4 days ago