Companies Act

AOC4 XBRL to be filed even if company not fall under specified class in succeeding years

AOC4 XBRL to be filed even if the company do not fall under the specified class of companies in succeeding years-MCA Notification

The Government has amended the Companies (Filing of Documents and Forms in Extensible Business Reporting Language) Rules, 2015. MCA has notified the Companies (Filing of Documents and Forms in Extensible Business Reporting Language) Amendment Rules, 2018.

Under the existing Rule 3 the following class of companies (excluding companies in Banking, lnsurance, Power Sector and Non Banking Financial companies ) are required to file their financial statement and other documents under section 137 of the Companies Act, 2013 with the Registrar of Companies (RoC) in e-form AOC-4 XBRL:-

(i) all companies listed with any Stock Exchange(s) in India and their Indian subsidiaries; or

(ii) all companies having paid up capital of rupees five crore or above;

(iii) all companies having turnover of rupees hundred crore or above; or

(iv) all companies which were hitherto covered under the Companies (Filing of Documents and Forms in Extensible Business Reporting Language) Rules, 2011.

It has been now provided that the companies which have filed their financial statements under existing Rule 3 shall continue to file their financial statements and other documents though they may not fall under the class of companies specified therein in succeeding years.

Similarly it has been provided that the companies which have filed their financial statements under the erstwhile rules, namely the Companies (Filing of Documents and Forms in Extensible Business Reporting Language) Rules, 2011, shall continue to file their financial statements and other documents as prescribed in existing rule 3 though they do not fall under the class of companies specified therein.

Download MCA Notification [F. No. 1/19/2013 –CL V] dated 8th March, 2018  Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Refusing to condone delay can result in a meritorious matter thrown out at threshold

Refusing to condone delay can result in a meritorious matter thrown out at very threshold against case being decided on…

9 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Prior period income cannot be considered as income of the current year

When prior period expenses are not admissible as deduction, following the same principle the prior period income also cannot be…

19 hours ago
  • Income Tax

SC condoned delay of 972 days in filing appeal due to restructuring in Department

Supreme Court condoned delay of 972 days in filing appeal due to restructuring in Income Tax Department In a recent…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

No addition on mere valuation report when stamp duty valuation is available

Addition can not be made relying on the valuation report of property when the stamp duty valuation is also available…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT deleted penalty for making a wrong claim of deduction u/s 54F/54B

Wrong claim of deduction u/s 54F/54B was not a case of concealment of particulars of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars…

2 days ago
  • GST

Value of taxable supply and rates notified Pan Masala / tobacco products

CBIC notifies GST rates and value of taxable supply for Biris, Pan Masala / tobacco products  Ministry of Finance(Department of…

2 days ago