Companies Act

Auditors appointment/rotation on term completion us 139(2) to be maximum at AGM date after three years from the date of commencement of Companies Act 2013

Government of India
Ministry of Corporate Affairs

ORDER

New Delhi, the 3oth June, 2016 

S.O. _ (E). – Whereas , the Companies Act , 2013 (18 of 2013) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) received the assent of the President on 29th August , 2013 and section 1 thereof came into force on the same date;

And , whereas , the provisions contained in section 139, which provides for appointment of auditors has come into force on the pt April, 2014;

And , whereas , sub-section (2) of section 139 of the said Act provides that no listed company and the prescribed class of companies shall appoint or re-appoint-

(a) an individual as auditor for more than one term of five consecutive years ; and
(b) an audit firm as auditor for more than two terms of five consecutive years ;

And , whereas , first proviso to sub-section (2) provides for period for which the individual auditor or audit firm who or which have completed term provided under such sub-section shall not be eligible for re-appointment as auditor in the same company ;

And , whereas , the third proviso to sub-section (2) provides that every company , existing on or before the commencement of this Act which is required to comply with provisions of sub-section (2) shall comply with the requirements of such sub-section within three years from the date of commencement of the said Act ;

And, whereas , as per provisions of sub-section (1) of section 139, the companies are required to appoint auditor at the annual general meeting who shall hold office from the conclusion of that meeting till the conclusion of sixth annual general meeting;

And, whereas , difficulties have arisen regarding compliance with the provisions of third proviso to sub-section (2) of section 139 in so far as they relate to the period within which companies would comply with provisions of sub-section (2) of section 139 of the said Act ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 470 of the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013) , the Central Government hereby makes the following Order to remove the above said difficulties , namely:-

1. Short title and –
(1) This Order may be called the Companies (Removal of Difficulties) Third Order, 2016
(2) It shall be deemed to have come into force from 151 April , 2014.

2. In the Companies Act , 2013 , in section 139, in sub-section (2), for the third proviso, the following proviso shall be substituted , namely:-

“Provided also that every company , existing on or before the commencement of this Act which is required to comply with the provisions of this sub-section , shall comply with requirements of this sub-section within a period which shall not be later than the date of the first annual general meeting of the company held, within the period specified under sub-section (1) of section 96, after three years from the date of commencement of this Act.”.

[F. No. 1/33/2013-CL-V]

(Amardeep Sigh Bhatia)
Joint Secretary to the Government of India

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

AO took a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat was 25 lakh – ITAT

Assessing Officer had taken a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat/text message was 25 lakh - ITAT…

8 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Shareholders can’t be taxed for income from properties owned by the company – HC

Shareholders are only owners of the shares of the company therefore, income from properties earned by the company cannot be…

10 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Jurisdictional error in reassessment approval can’t be shielded by the law of limitation

When approval for reassessment was granted by unauthorised authority, such jurisdictional error cannot be shielded by the law of limitation…

13 hours ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT ought to remanded whole matter of bogus purchases instead of profit determination

ITAT on presumption of bogus purchases ought to have remanded case to AO to reconsider the whole matter instead of…

13 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Where proceedings u/s 153C barred by limitation, AO can’t invoke section 148 & 148A

Where proceedings u/s 153C are barred by limitation, AO can not reopen the case invoking section 148 and 148A of…

1 day ago
  • bankruptcy

Corporate guarantees executed by corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC

Corporate guarantees executed by the corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC and banks to be recognized as financial creditors…

1 day ago