Companies Act

Auditors appointment/rotation on term completion us 139(2) to be maximum at AGM date after three years from the date of commencement of Companies Act 2013

Government of India
Ministry of Corporate Affairs

ORDER

New Delhi, the 3oth June, 2016 

S.O. _ (E). – Whereas , the Companies Act , 2013 (18 of 2013) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) received the assent of the President on 29th August , 2013 and section 1 thereof came into force on the same date;

And , whereas , the provisions contained in section 139, which provides for appointment of auditors has come into force on the pt April, 2014;

And , whereas , sub-section (2) of section 139 of the said Act provides that no listed company and the prescribed class of companies shall appoint or re-appoint-

(a) an individual as auditor for more than one term of five consecutive years ; and
(b) an audit firm as auditor for more than two terms of five consecutive years ;

And , whereas , first proviso to sub-section (2) provides for period for which the individual auditor or audit firm who or which have completed term provided under such sub-section shall not be eligible for re-appointment as auditor in the same company ;

And , whereas , the third proviso to sub-section (2) provides that every company , existing on or before the commencement of this Act which is required to comply with provisions of sub-section (2) shall comply with the requirements of such sub-section within three years from the date of commencement of the said Act ;

And, whereas , as per provisions of sub-section (1) of section 139, the companies are required to appoint auditor at the annual general meeting who shall hold office from the conclusion of that meeting till the conclusion of sixth annual general meeting;

And, whereas , difficulties have arisen regarding compliance with the provisions of third proviso to sub-section (2) of section 139 in so far as they relate to the period within which companies would comply with provisions of sub-section (2) of section 139 of the said Act ;

Now, therefore , in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 470 of the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013) , the Central Government hereby makes the following Order to remove the above said difficulties , namely:-

1. Short title and –
(1) This Order may be called the Companies (Removal of Difficulties) Third Order, 2016
(2) It shall be deemed to have come into force from 151 April , 2014.

2. In the Companies Act , 2013 , in section 139, in sub-section (2), for the third proviso, the following proviso shall be substituted , namely:-

“Provided also that every company , existing on or before the commencement of this Act which is required to comply with the provisions of this sub-section , shall comply with requirements of this sub-section within a period which shall not be later than the date of the first annual general meeting of the company held, within the period specified under sub-section (1) of section 96, after three years from the date of commencement of this Act.”.

[F. No. 1/33/2013-CL-V]

(Amardeep Sigh Bhatia)
Joint Secretary to the Government of India

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

ITAT allows exemption of Rs. 25 lakhs u/s 10(10A) to non-government employees

ITAT allowed increased exemption of Rs. 25 lakhs u/s 10(10A) to non-government employees in view of CBDT retrospective notification. In…

20 hours ago
  • Income Tax

PCIT has revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 over the cases passed by the NFAC or the JAO

PCIT has revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 over the cases irrespective of the fact that the relevant assessment was completed physical…

1 day ago
  • Insurance

Appellate court interfering with MACT finding must undertake reappreciation of evidence

Appellate court interfering with Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal findings on assessment of disability and loss of earning capacity must undertake…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

When delay is not huge & involves huge monetary liability, lenient approach to be taken

When period of delay is not very huge and involve huge monetary liability on the assessee, a lenient approach should…

2 days ago
  • SEBI

EoGM of company can not ratify diversion of fund raised by preferential issue – SC

Ratification by EoGM of the company can not give legality of the diversion of the fund raised by preferential issue.…

3 days ago
  • Excise/Custom

Return of export cargo from Hormuz Strait where vessel do not lands at original port

CBIC prescribes procedures for return of export cargo from international waters due to closure of the Strait of Hormuz where…

3 days ago