Companies Act

Companies Removal of Names from ROC Register Amendment Rules 2019. Fee increased to Rs. 10000/-

The Companies Removal of Names from ROC Register Amendment Rules 2019. Fee increased to Rs. 10000/-

Government of India
Ministry of Corporate Affairs

Notification

New Delhi, dated the 9th May ‘2019

G.S.R,……(E).- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub’sections (1)’ (2) and
sub.section (4) of section 248 read with section 469 of the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013), the central Government hereby makes the following rules further to amend the companies (Removal of Names of Companies from the Register of Companies) Rules, 2016, namely:-

1. (1) These rules may be called the Companies (Removal of Names of Companies from the Register of Companies) Amendment Rules, 2019′

(2) They shall come into force with effect from 10th May, 2019.

2. In the Companies (Removal of Names of Companies from the Register of Companies) Rules, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as the principal rules), in rule 4,-

(a) in sub-rule (1), for the words “five thousand rupees”, the following shall be substituted, namely:-

“ten thousand rupees:

Provided that no application in Form No ‘STK-2 shall be filed by a company unless it has filed overdue returns in Form No. AOC4 (Financial statement) or AOC-4 XBRL, as the case may be, and Form No. MGT-7 (Annual Return), up to the end of the financial year in which the company ceased to carry its business operations:

Provided further that in case a company intends to file Form No. STK-2 after the action under sub-section (1) of section 248 has been initiated by the Registrar, it shall file all pending overdue returns in Form No. AOC-4 (Financial statement) or AOC 4 XBRL, as the case may be, and Form No. MGT-7 (Annual Return) before filing Form No. STK-2.

Provided also that once notice in Form No. STK-7 has been issued by the Registrar Pursuant to the action initiated under sub-section (1) of section 248, abcaus.in company shall not be allowed to file an application in Form No. STK-2.

(b) in sub-rule (3), in clause (ii), after the words, “statement of words, letters and figures “in Form No. STK-8” shall be inserted’

3. In the Annexure to the principal rules,-

(a) in Form No. STK-4, in serial Number 2, after item (vii), the following item shall be inserted, namely:-

“(viii) The company has fulfilled all pending compliances, if any [Applicable in case an application under sub-section (2) of section 248 has been filed after the initiation of action under sub-section (1) of section 248].

(b) after Form No. STK -7, the following Form shall be inserted’ namely:-

Form No. SKT-8

[See rule 4(3)(ii)]

Statement of Account

[F. No. 1/28/2013-CL-V (Part)l

K V R Murty
Joint Secretary to the Government of India

Note : The principal rules were published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3 of sub-section (i) vide number G.S.R. 1174(E), dated 26th December, 2016 and amended vide notification No. G.S.R 355(E), dated the 12th April,2017 

Download Notification Click Here >>

----------- Similar Posts: -----------
Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Notice issued u/s 143(2) prior to filing of return of income assessee is invalid

Notice issued u/s 143(2) prior to filing of return of income by the assessee was invalid. Before filing ITR provisions…

23 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Order u/s 148A(d) passed against non-existent entity is bad in eyes of law – High Court

Order u/s 148A(d) passed against non-existent entity is bad in eyes of law. Mere activation of PAN not give right…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Tax authorities not bound with provisions of section 44AE once assessee waived option

Tax authorities not bound with provisions of section 44AE of the Act once assessee waived the option available In a…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Whether seized document is incriminating or not is a findings of fact – High Court

Whether seized document is incriminating or not is definitely a findings of fact – High Court In a recent judgment,…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Interest earned on borrowed funds/unutilized capital subsidy is capital receipts – High Court

Interest earned on borrowed funds/ unutilized capital subsidy are capital receipts In a recent judgment, Hon'ble Guwahati High Court has…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

No statutory requirement of pre-deposit for stay of demand under Income Tax Act – HC

There is no statutory requirement of pre-deposit for stay of demand under Income Tax Act - High Court stayed demand  …

3 days ago