Companies Act

The Companies (Significant Beneficial Owners) 2nd Amendment Rules 2019. Revised Form BEN-2

The Companies (Significant Beneficial Owners) second Amendment Rules, 2019. Revised Form BEN-2

MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS

NOTIFICATION

New Delhi, the 1st July, 2019

G.S.R. 466(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (1) and (2) of section 469 read with section 90 of the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013), the Central Government hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Companies (Significant Beneficial Owners) Rules, 2018, namely:-

1. (1) These rules may be called the Companies (Significant Beneficial Owners) second Amendment Rules, 2019.

(2) They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.

2. In the principal rules, for Form No. BEN-2, the following Form shall be substituted, namely:—

FORM NO. BEN-2

[Pursuant to section 90(4) of The Companies Act, 2013 and rule 4 and rule 8 of the Companies (Significant Beneficial Owners) Rules, 2018]

Return to the Registrar in respect of declaration under section 90

…………………………………….

…………………………………….

Note : Attention is also drawn to provisions of Section 448 and 449 which provide for punishment for false statement and punishment for false evidence respectively.

This e-Form has been taken on file maintained by the register of companies through electronic mode and on the basis of statement of correctness given by the Director and professional.

[F.No. 1/1/2018 CL-V]

K.V.R.MURTY, Jt. Secy.

Note : The principal rules were published in the Gazette of India, Part II, Extra ordinary, Section 3, Sub-section (i) vide number G.S.R. 561(E), dated the 13th June, 2018 and subsequently amended vide number G.S.R.100 (E), dated the 8th February, 2019.

Download Notification Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Government

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App not disproportionate – Delhi High Court

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App under section 69A of IT Act 2000 is not disproportionate - Delhi HC…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA to means a project or an undertaking owned…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash not owner who came up to own it

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash…

5 days ago
  • RTI

Lokayukta Police not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005 – SC

Lokayukta Police not an ‘intelligence and security’ organisation  and hence not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005…

7 days ago
  • Income Tax

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST – case remanded for determination In a recent…

1 week ago
  • ICAI

CA Misconduct – Order quashed as judgment not passed by same members who heard arguments.

CA Misconduct – Appellate order quashed as final judgment was not passed by same members who heard arguments. In a…

2 weeks ago