The Companies (Significant Beneficial Owners) second Amendment Rules, 2019. Revised Form BEN-2
MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS
NOTIFICATION
New Delhi, the 1st July, 2019
G.S.R. 466(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (1) and (2) of section 469 read with section 90 of the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013), the Central Government hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Companies (Significant Beneficial Owners) Rules, 2018, namely:-
1. (1) These rules may be called the Companies (Significant Beneficial Owners) second Amendment Rules, 2019.
(2) They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.
2. In the principal rules, for Form No. BEN-2, the following Form shall be substituted, namely:—
[Pursuant to section 90(4) of The Companies Act, 2013 and rule 4 and rule 8 of the Companies (Significant Beneficial Owners) Rules, 2018]
…………………………………….
…………………………………….
Note : Attention is also drawn to provisions of Section 448 and 449 which provide for punishment for false statement and punishment for false evidence respectively.
This e-Form has been taken on file maintained by the register of companies through electronic mode and on the basis of statement of correctness given by the Director and professional.
[F.No. 1/1/2018 CL-V]
K.V.R.MURTY, Jt. Secy.
Note : The principal rules were published in the Gazette of India, Part II, Extra ordinary, Section 3, Sub-section (i) vide number G.S.R. 561(E), dated the 13th June, 2018 and subsequently amended vide number G.S.R.100 (E), dated the 8th February, 2019.
Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…
ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…
Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…
The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…
One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…
Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…