The Companies (Significant Beneficial Owners) second Amendment Rules, 2019. Revised Form BEN-2
MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS
NOTIFICATION
New Delhi, the 1st July, 2019
G.S.R. 466(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (1) and (2) of section 469 read with section 90 of the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013), the Central Government hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Companies (Significant Beneficial Owners) Rules, 2018, namely:-
1. (1) These rules may be called the Companies (Significant Beneficial Owners) second Amendment Rules, 2019.
(2) They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.
2. In the principal rules, for Form No. BEN-2, the following Form shall be substituted, namely:—
[Pursuant to section 90(4) of The Companies Act, 2013 and rule 4 and rule 8 of the Companies (Significant Beneficial Owners) Rules, 2018]
…………………………………….
…………………………………….
Note : Attention is also drawn to provisions of Section 448 and 449 which provide for punishment for false statement and punishment for false evidence respectively.
This e-Form has been taken on file maintained by the register of companies through electronic mode and on the basis of statement of correctness given by the Director and professional.
[F.No. 1/1/2018 CL-V]
K.V.R.MURTY, Jt. Secy.
Note : The principal rules were published in the Gazette of India, Part II, Extra ordinary, Section 3, Sub-section (i) vide number G.S.R. 561(E), dated the 13th June, 2018 and subsequently amended vide number G.S.R.100 (E), dated the 8th February, 2019.
Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App under section 69A of IT Act 2000 is not disproportionate - Delhi HC…
High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA to means a project or an undertaking owned…
Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash…
Lokayukta Police not an ‘intelligence and security’ organisation and hence not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005…
Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST – case remanded for determination In a recent…
CA Misconduct – Appellate order quashed as final judgment was not passed by same members who heard arguments. In a…