Companies Act

ICAI not authorised to clarify on applicability of auditors rotation – MCA

 ICAI not authorised to clarify on applicability of auditors rotation in a company u/s 139 of the Companies Act, 2013, MCA asks ICAI to withdraw announcement

F. No. 01/33/2013-CL.V (Pt.)
Government of India
Ministry of Corporate Affairs

5th Floor, A Wing, Shastri Bhawan,
Dr. Rajendra Prasad Road, New Delhi- 110001

Dated:- 15th February, 2019

To,

The President,
Institute of Chartered Accountants of India,
ICAI Bhawan,Post Box No. 7112,
Indraprastha Marg, New Delhi-110002.

Sub:- ICAI’s announcement regarding clarification on Applicability of Rotation principles on a company as per Section 139 of the Companies Act, 2013-Reg

Sir,

I am directed to refer to subject cited above and to state that ICAI has issued an announcement regarding clarification on Applicability of Rotation principles on a company as per Section 139 of the Companies Act, 2013, where the company ceases to fall under the ambit of Rotation principles in subsequent years .

In this connection, it is stated that the issuance of any clarification on different provisions of Companies Act falls in the domain of this Ministry, and ICAI is neither empowered nor competent to issue such clarification and especially so without prior consultation with this Ministry.

2. In view of above, you are requested to immediately withdraw the said announcement & intimate this Ministry the reasons for issuing such announcement without any authority & without the specific approval of this Ministry.

3. This issues with the approval of competent authority.

Yours faithfully,

(Atma Sah)
Deputy Director Tel:- 23386065

Copy to:-

  1. Debashis Mitra, Chairman, Corporate Laws & Corporate Governance Committee Institute of Chartered Accountants of India,ICAI Bhawan, Post Box No. 7112,Indraprastha Marg,New Delhi-110002 .
  2. The Secretary, Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, ICAI Bhawan, Post Box No. 7112, Indraprastha Marg, New Delhi-110002.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Government

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App not disproportionate – Delhi High Court

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App under section 69A of IT Act 2000 is not disproportionate - Delhi HC…

15 minutes ago
  • Income Tax

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA to means a project or an undertaking owned…

3 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash not owner who came up to own it

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash…

2 days ago
  • RTI

Lokayukta Police not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005 – SC

Lokayukta Police not an ‘intelligence and security’ organisation  and hence not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST – case remanded for determination In a recent…

6 days ago
  • ICAI

CA Misconduct – Order quashed as judgment not passed by same members who heard arguments.

CA Misconduct – Appellate order quashed as final judgment was not passed by same members who heard arguments. In a…

1 week ago