Companies Act

IEPF Form Filing-Relaxation of additional fees. Form IEPF1 can be filed up to 03-10-2016-MCA Notification

IEPF Form Filing-Relaxation of additional fees. For Form 1-INV falling between 25-03-2016 to 06-09-2016, Form IEPF1 can be filed up to 03-10-2016-MCA Notification

General Circular No. 10/2016

No. 05/05/2016-IEPF
Government of India
Ministry of Corporate Affairs

5th Floor, ‘A” Wing,
Shastri Bhawan, Dr. R. P. Road
New Delhi, 110001
Dated: 07.09.2016

To
The IEPF Authority
All Regional Directors,
All Registrars of Companies,
All Stakeholders

Subject: Relaxation of additional fees for filing Form IEPF-1

Sir,

The Ministry had deployed the V2R2 version of MCA21 on 28th March, 2016. Consequently, the Form 1-INV as prescribed under the Companies Act, 1956 was not available for filing on the MCA21 portal since 25th March, 2016. In view of this and deployment of the new form IEPF-1 (which replaces earlier Form 1-INV) after the notification of Investor Education and Protection Fund (Accounting, Audit, Transfer and Refund) Rules, 2016 [IEPF (AATR) Rules] with effect from 7th September, 2016, it is clarified that companies that have not filed the requisite information in Form-1 INV can now file the information in Form IEPF-1. Further, as a onetime measure, the companies with due date for filing of the form 1-INV falling between the period 25th March, 2016 to 6th September, 2016, the companies may file the form IEPF-1 without additional fees on or before 06.10.2016.

2. This issues with the approval of the Competent Authority.

Yours faithfully

(Monika Gupta)
Deputy Director 

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash not owner who came up to own it

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash…

2 days ago
  • RTI

Lokayukta Police not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005 – SC

Lokayukta Police not an ‘intelligence and security’ organisation  and hence not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST – case remanded for determination In a recent…

6 days ago
  • ICAI

CA Misconduct – Order quashed as judgment not passed by same members who heard arguments.

CA Misconduct – Appellate order quashed as final judgment was not passed by same members who heard arguments. In a…

1 week ago
  • Insurance

Deceased homemaker can not be considered as dependant for award of compensation under MV Act – SC

Deceased homemaker can not be considered as dependant for award of compensation under MV Act. Courts to award a composite…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

CIT notice u/s 263 quashed as AO rightly took DVO value of property as actual sale price

CIT Revision notice u/s 263 quashed as the Assessing Officer rightly taken DVO value of property sold as actual sale…

1 week ago