IEPF Form Filing-Relaxation of additional fees. For Form 1-INV falling between 25-03-2016 to 06-09-2016, Form IEPF1 can be filed up to 03-10-2016-MCA Notification
General Circular No. 10/2016
No. 05/05/2016-IEPF
Government of India
Ministry of Corporate Affairs
5th Floor, ‘A” Wing,
Shastri Bhawan, Dr. R. P. Road
New Delhi, 110001
Dated: 07.09.2016
To
The IEPF Authority
All Regional Directors,
All Registrars of Companies,
All Stakeholders
Subject: Relaxation of additional fees for filing Form IEPF-1
Sir,
The Ministry had deployed the V2R2 version of MCA21 on 28th March, 2016. Consequently, the Form 1-INV as prescribed under the Companies Act, 1956 was not available for filing on the MCA21 portal since 25th March, 2016. In view of this and deployment of the new form IEPF-1 (which replaces earlier Form 1-INV) after the notification of Investor Education and Protection Fund (Accounting, Audit, Transfer and Refund) Rules, 2016 [IEPF (AATR) Rules] with effect from 7th September, 2016, it is clarified that companies that have not filed the requisite information in Form-1 INV can now file the information in Form IEPF-1. Further, as a onetime measure, the companies with due date for filing of the form 1-INV falling between the period 25th March, 2016 to 6th September, 2016, the companies may file the form IEPF-1 without additional fees on or before 06.10.2016.
2. This issues with the approval of the Competent Authority.
Yours faithfully
(Monika Gupta)
Deputy Director
Non issuance of notice u/s 143(2) for return filed u/s 148 even though belatedly, makes the assessment framed bad in…
Calculation of functional disability depends on assessing the victim’s earning capacity in the open, competitive market – Supreme Court In…
Appeal against every decision of ITAT shall lie only before the High Court within whose jurisdiction the Assessing Officer who…
Supreme Court recommends action against Commissioner of Customs who relied upon non-existent AI generated case laws. Supreme Court recommends action…
ITAT power to pass such orders "as it thinks fit" implies a judicial discretion to be exercised within the parameters…
Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…