Companies Act

Issue of duplicate shares under IEPF Rules. Procedure of transmission of shares to be followed – MCA

Issue of duplicate shares under IEPF Rules. Procedure of transmission of shares to be followed and duplicate shares need not be issued. MCA Clarification

General Circular No. 7/2017

F. No. 05/23/2016-IEPF
Government of India
Ministry of Corporate Affairs

To,
All Stakeholders,      .
Nodal Officer’s (IEPF) of Concerned Companies
All Regional Director’s & Registrar of Companies of Min of Corp. Affairs

5th Floor, ‘A’ Wing, Shastri Bhawan,
Dr. R. P. Road, New Delhi
Dated: 05th June, 2017

Subject: Clarification regarding transmission of Securities by Operation of Law – Reg.

Sir/Madam,

Clarity has been sought by stakeholders w.r.t. issue of duplicate shares under Rule 6 (3)(d) of the Investor Education and Protection  Fund Authority  (Accounting, Audit, Transfer and Refund) Rules, 2016. It has been stated that since transfer of shares to IEPF under section 124 (6) of the Companies Act, 2013 read with rules referred to above takes place on account of operation of law hence the procedure followed during transmission of shares may be followed in such cases and duplicate shares need not be issued in such cases . The suggestion made by the stakeholders has been examined in the Ministry and it is clarified that the procedure similar to what is followed in case of transmission of shares may be followed by companies while transferring shares to IEPF Authority pursuant to section 124 (6) read with applicable rules.

2. This issues with the approval of the Competent Authority.

Yours faithfully,

(Monika Gupta)
Deputy Director

Copy to:

(1) CEO, IEPF Authority
(2) Sr. AO, IEPF Authority
(3) E-Governance Cell/MCA and to place this circular on Ministry’s Authority website and for necessary coordination with M/ s Infosys Ltd.
(4) Guard File.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

AO not justified in rejecting registered valuer’s report without reference to DVO – ITAT

AO not justified in rejecting registered valuer’s report without making a reference to the DVO - ITAT In a recent…

4 days ago
  • FCRA

FCRA specifies list of 105 purposes to be selected for which registration is applied

FCRA specifies list of purposes to be selected for which registration is applied.  The Ministry of Home Affairs has notified…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

Withholding tax u/s 40(a)(i) not required on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent company

Assessee was not liable to withhold tax at source u/s 40(a)(i) on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent company In a…

1 week ago
  • Government

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App not disproportionate – Delhi High Court

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App under section 69A of IT Act 2000 is not disproportionate - Delhi HC…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA to means a project or an undertaking owned…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash not owner who came up to own it

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash…

2 weeks ago