Issue of duplicate shares under IEPF Rules. Procedure of transmission of shares to be followed and duplicate shares need not be issued. MCA Clarification
General Circular No. 7/2017
F. No. 05/23/2016-IEPF
Government of India
Ministry of Corporate Affairs
To,
All Stakeholders, .
Nodal Officer’s (IEPF) of Concerned Companies
All Regional Director’s & Registrar of Companies of Min of Corp. Affairs
5th Floor, ‘A’ Wing, Shastri Bhawan,
Dr. R. P. Road, New Delhi
Dated: 05th June, 2017
Subject: Clarification regarding transmission of Securities by Operation of Law – Reg.
Sir/Madam,
Clarity has been sought by stakeholders w.r.t. issue of duplicate shares under Rule 6 (3)(d) of the Investor Education and Protection Fund Authority (Accounting, Audit, Transfer and Refund) Rules, 2016. It has been stated that since transfer of shares to IEPF under section 124 (6) of the Companies Act, 2013 read with rules referred to above takes place on account of operation of law hence the procedure followed during transmission of shares may be followed in such cases and duplicate shares need not be issued in such cases . The suggestion made by the stakeholders has been examined in the Ministry and it is clarified that the procedure similar to what is followed in case of transmission of shares may be followed by companies while transferring shares to IEPF Authority pursuant to section 124 (6) read with applicable rules.
2. This issues with the approval of the Competent Authority.
Yours faithfully,
(Monika Gupta)
Deputy Director
Copy to:
(1) CEO, IEPF Authority
(2) Sr. AO, IEPF Authority
(3) E-Governance Cell/MCA and to place this circular on Ministry’s Authority website and for necessary coordination with M/ s Infosys Ltd.
(4) Guard File.
RBI specifies ‘Related Party’ with respect to bank RBI has issued RBI Credit Risk Management Directions, 2025 defining ‘Related Party’…
Advisory on Filing Opt-In Declaration for Specified Premises, 2025 Dear Taxpayers, The relevant declarations issued vide Notification No. 05/2025 –…
FAQs for HSNS Cess Act, 2025 and HSNS Cess Rules, 2026 Q1. Who is required to get registered under the…
Refusing to condone delay can result in a meritorious matter thrown out at very threshold against case being decided on…
When prior period expenses are not admissible as deduction, following the same principle the prior period income also cannot be…
Supreme Court condoned delay of 972 days in filing appeal due to restructuring in Income Tax Department In a recent…