Issue of duplicate shares under IEPF Rules. Procedure of transmission of shares to be followed and duplicate shares need not be issued. MCA Clarification
General Circular No. 7/2017
F. No. 05/23/2016-IEPF
Government of India
Ministry of Corporate Affairs
To,
All Stakeholders, .
Nodal Officer’s (IEPF) of Concerned Companies
All Regional Director’s & Registrar of Companies of Min of Corp. Affairs
5th Floor, ‘A’ Wing, Shastri Bhawan,
Dr. R. P. Road, New Delhi
Dated: 05th June, 2017
Subject: Clarification regarding transmission of Securities by Operation of Law – Reg.
Sir/Madam,
Clarity has been sought by stakeholders w.r.t. issue of duplicate shares under Rule 6 (3)(d) of the Investor Education and Protection Fund Authority (Accounting, Audit, Transfer and Refund) Rules, 2016. It has been stated that since transfer of shares to IEPF under section 124 (6) of the Companies Act, 2013 read with rules referred to above takes place on account of operation of law hence the procedure followed during transmission of shares may be followed in such cases and duplicate shares need not be issued in such cases . The suggestion made by the stakeholders has been examined in the Ministry and it is clarified that the procedure similar to what is followed in case of transmission of shares may be followed by companies while transferring shares to IEPF Authority pursuant to section 124 (6) read with applicable rules.
2. This issues with the approval of the Competent Authority.
Yours faithfully,
(Monika Gupta)
Deputy Director
Copy to:
(1) CEO, IEPF Authority
(2) Sr. AO, IEPF Authority
(3) E-Governance Cell/MCA and to place this circular on Ministry’s Authority website and for necessary coordination with M/ s Infosys Ltd.
(4) Guard File.
Engagement of Company Secretaries (CS) as Young Professionals in the Office of Regional Director (WR), Registrar of Companies, Mumbai and…
Applicability of provisions of Section 115BBE read with Section 69, 69A and 69C in a case arising before Settlement Commission…
Addition u/s 68 for jewellery purportedly received on death of grandparent under Will upheld. In a recent judgment, ITAT upheld…
Supreme Court lays down tests to determine whether a debt is a financial debt or an operational debt under IBC…
Merely because directors of two companies were common not mean that deposits received was bogus and companies were shell companies…
Application though named as rectification but if tax imposed is not legitimate then it also touches upon the merit –…