Companies Act

MCA Advisory on status of various revised Charge eForms

MCA Advisory on status of Charge related revised eForms

Sr.
No.
Form Remarks
1. CHG-1/9

CHG-1/9 containing changes of the Companies (Amendment) Ordinance 2019 is under progress. However, the existing form CHG-1/9 has been restricted for registering charges created or modified on or after 02.11.2018 if the form is filed after 120 days of the date of such creation or modification.

Stakeholders may kindly note that in case charge is created or modified after 02.11.2018 and 120 days have expired therefrom, the form CHG-1/9 cannot be filed to register such charges and there is no option for condonation of delay.

2. CHG-8

CHG-8 containing changes of the Companies (Amendment) Ordinance 2019 is under progress

3. CHG-4 Changes to CHG-4 based on the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017 have been made in the form CHG-4 since December 25, 2018. However, the forms filed between 05.07.2018 to 24.12.2018 where condonation is asked for, stakeholders may contact the jurisdictional RoCs to request for an additional resubmission chance. On resubmitting the revised form, there shall be no requirement of condonation to be filed if form is filed after 30 days and within 300 days of satisfaction of charge.
4. RD-1 As clarified vide the Circular issued by MCA dated 11.03.2019, pending deployment of form RD-1 for purpose ‘Change in financial year’ and ‘Conversion of public company to private company’, stakeholders may continue to file such application in form RD-1 by selecting ‘Others’ option and giving the details thereof in the relevant text box, and the same shall be accepted for processing by the Regional Director. 
5. GNL-5 Development of RD GNL-5 containing changes with reference to the Companies (Amendment) Ordinance 2019 is in progress.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

ITAT allows exemption of Rs. 25 lakhs u/s 10(10A) to non-government employees

ITAT allowed increased exemption of Rs. 25 lakhs u/s 10(10A) to non-government employees in view of CBDT retrospective notification. In…

17 hours ago
  • Income Tax

PCIT has revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 over the cases passed by the NFAC or the JAO

PCIT has revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 over the cases irrespective of the fact that the relevant assessment was completed physical…

1 day ago
  • Insurance

Appellate court interfering with MACT finding must undertake reappreciation of evidence

Appellate court interfering with Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal findings on assessment of disability and loss of earning capacity must undertake…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

When delay is not huge & involves huge monetary liability, lenient approach to be taken

When period of delay is not very huge and involve huge monetary liability on the assessee, a lenient approach should…

2 days ago
  • SEBI

EoGM of company can not ratify diversion of fund raised by preferential issue – SC

Ratification by EoGM of the company can not give legality of the diversion of the fund raised by preferential issue.…

3 days ago
  • Excise/Custom

Return of export cargo from Hormuz Strait where vessel do not lands at original port

CBIC prescribes procedures for return of export cargo from international waters due to closure of the Strait of Hormuz where…

3 days ago