MCA further extends timelines for filing Forms for charge creation/modifications
Earlier MCA vide Circular No. 07/2021 dated 3rd May 2021 gave relaxations of time in filing forms for charges creation or modification where the date of creation/modification of charge was before 01.04.2021, but the timeline for filing such form had not expired as on 01.04.2021, or the date of creation/modification falls on any date between 01.04.2021 to 31.5.2021 (both dates inclusive).
MCA has further extended the timelines for filing forms for charge creation or modification. As per MCA latest circular No. 12/2021 dated 30th June 2021, the relaxation of time is as under:
a. In case a form is filed in respect of charge created/modified before 01.04.2021, but the timeline for filing such form had not expired under section 77 of the Act as on 01.04.2021, the period beginning from 01.04.2021 and ending on 31.07.2021 shall not be reckoned for the purpose of counting the number of days under section 77 or section 78 of the Act. In case, the form is not filed within such period, the first day after 31.03.2021 shall be reckoned as 01.08.2021 for the purpose of counting the number of days within which the form is required to be filed under section 77 or section 78 of the Act.
b. In case a form is filed in respect of charge created/modified on any date between 01.04.2021 to 31.5.2021 (both dates inclusive), the period beginning from the date of creation/modification of charge to 31.07.2021 shall not be reckoned for the purpose of counting of days under section 77 or section 78 of the Act. In case, the form is not filed within such period, the first day after the date of creation/modification of charge shall be reckoned as 01.08.2021 for the purpose of counting the number of days within which the Form is required to be filed under section 77 or section 78 of the Act.
Other conditions/requirements specified in the Circular No.07/2021 shall remain unchanged.
Assessing Officer had taken a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat/text message was 25 lakh - ITAT…
Shareholders are only owners of the shares of the company therefore, income from properties earned by the company cannot be…
When approval for reassessment was granted by unauthorised authority, such jurisdictional error cannot be shielded by the law of limitation…
ITAT on presumption of bogus purchases ought to have remanded case to AO to reconsider the whole matter instead of…
Where proceedings u/s 153C are barred by limitation, AO can not reopen the case invoking section 148 and 148A of…
Corporate guarantees executed by the corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC and banks to be recognized as financial creditors…