Companies Act

Companies (Removal of Names of Cos from Register of Companies) Amendment Rules 2022  

The Companies (Removal of Names of Companies from the Register of Companies) Amendment Rules, 2022

Notice of defect in Form STK-2 to be given by Registrar of Companies (RoC) in Form STK-1

Rule 4 of the n the Companies (Removal of Names of Companies from the Register of Companies) Rules, 2016 has been amended to provide that where the Registrar, on examining the application made in Form STK-2, finds that it is necessary to call for further information or finds such application or any document annexed therewith is defective or incomplete in any respect, he shall inform to the applicant to remove the defects and re-submit the complete Form within fifteen days from the date of such information, failing which the Registrar shall treat the Form as invalid in the electronic record, and shall inform the applicant, accordingly.

After the re-submission of the Form or document, if the Registrar finds that the Form or document is defective or incomplete in any respect, he shall give further time of fifteen days to remove such defects or complete the Form, failing which the Registrar shall treat the Form as invalid in the electronic record and shall inform the applicant, accordingly.

Any re-submission of the application in Form STK-2 made prior to the commencement of the Companies (Removal of Names of Companies from the Register of Companies) Amendment Rules, 2022 shall not be counted for the purposes of reckoning the maximum number of re

Further, Form No. STK1 (Notice by Registrar for removal of name of a company from the register of companies), Form No. STK –5 (Public Notice) and Form No. STK-5A (Public Notice) has been substituted.

Download MCA Notification Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • GST

GST Advisory & FAQs on Electronic Credit Reversal & Re-claimed Statement & RCM Liability

GSTN Advisory & FAQs related to Electronic Credit Reversal and Re-claimed Statement and RCM Liability/ITC Statement To ensure correct and…

2 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Negligence of tax payer would not make exempt income taxable – ITAT

It is well settled that if any receipt cannot be subjected to tax being exempt under law, negligence of any…

13 hours ago
  • GST

For a notice sent by GSTN Portal no inference may be drawn as to its actual service

Since UPGST Authorities unable to inform when notice sent by GSTN Portal may have been retrieved or downloaded, no inference…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Cash deposit of Rs. 250000 cr (credit) misread as crores by AO – Plea declined

High Court declines plea of assessee that Income Tax Department wrongly read amount of cash deposit of Rs. 250000 Cr…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Discontinuance of business of firm will not vest ownership of firm’s property with partners

Discontinuance of business of partnership firm will not result in vesting ownership of firm's property with individual partners for capital…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Release of seized jewellery/gold u/s 132B within 120 days is directory not mandatory

Stipulation of 120 days for release of seized jewellery/gold u/s 132B is directory not mandatory – Delhi High Court In…

2 days ago