Companies (Removal of Names of Cos from Register of Companies) Amendment Rules 2022  

The Companies (Removal of Names of Companies from the Register of Companies) Amendment Rules, 2022

Notice of defect in Form STK-2 to be given by Registrar of Companies (RoC) in Form STK-1

Rule 4 of the n the Companies (Removal of Names of Companies from the Register of Companies) Rules, 2016 has been amended to provide that where the Registrar, on examining the application made in Form STK-2, finds that it is necessary to call for further information or finds such application or any document annexed therewith is defective or incomplete in any respect, he shall inform to the applicant to remove the defects and re-submit the complete Form within fifteen days from the date of such information, failing which the Registrar shall treat the Form as invalid in the electronic record, and shall inform the applicant, accordingly.

After the re-submission of the Form or document, if the Registrar finds that the Form or document is defective or incomplete in any respect, he shall give further time of fifteen days to remove such defects or complete the Form, failing which the Registrar shall treat the Form as invalid in the electronic record and shall inform the applicant, accordingly.

Any re-submission of the application in Form STK-2 made prior to the commencement of the Companies (Removal of Names of Companies from the Register of Companies) Amendment Rules, 2022 shall not be counted for the purposes of reckoning the maximum number of re

Further, Form No. STK1 (Notice by Registrar for removal of name of a company from the register of companies), Form No. STK –5 (Public Notice) and Form No. STK-5A (Public Notice) has been substituted.

Download MCA Notification Click Here >>

• Denying accumulation of u/s 11(2) merely on grounds of delay in filing Form No. 10 is unsustainable
• Engagement of 05 Young Professionals CAs at Central Registrar of Cooperative Society
• AO can’t take two different stands on immunity u/s 270AA(2) for a same transaction
• ITAT held 2000 gram jewellery reasonable in view of customary practices & CBDT Instruction
• Documents obtained post search & information obtained from public domain not incriminating material