EPFO

Change of date of birth of Employees Pension Fund member to be approved by Officer lncharge of the concerned office

Change of date of birth of Employees Pension Fund member to be approved by Officer lncharge of the concerned office. Clarification by EPFO

EMPLOYEES’ PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION
Bhavishya Nidhi Bhawan, 14, Bhikaiji Cama Place, New Delhi 110 066.

No.Pension-ll/instructions/Guidelines/2016-17/33314                                                                 Dated: 10 MAR 2017

To
All ACCs (Zonal Office)
All Regional P.F. Commissioner (In-Charge of Regions)
All Officers – In – Charge of SROs

Sub : Change of date of birth of Employees Pension Fund member – reg.

Ref : 1. This office letter no. Pension-l/lnstructions/Guidelines/2016/ 11900 dated 07.10.2016.
         2. This office letter no. Pension/3/8/0R/1/2005/69869 dated 12.12.2016.

Sir,

vide Head Office letter no. Pension-l/lnstructions/Guidelines/2016/ 11900 dated 07.10.2016 it was directed that the request for change in date of birth must have approval of RPFC in charge of the Region.

However, it has been reported that there is considerable delay in considering the request for change in date of birth of members under the E PS, 95 on account of transfer of file from SRO to RO.

This leads to discontentment among members and also generates large number of grievances. Further, after restructuring 100 offices are headed by RPFC-I level officers and only 35 offices are headed by RPFC-II.

The matter has been examined and in order to obviate t he difficulties faced by the field offices it has been decided to partially modify the existing instructions issued vide aforesaid letter 07.10.2016 as under :

” The request for change in date of birth must have approval of the Officer lncharge of the concerned office.”

These instruction will be applicable to all the requests for change in date of birth with immediate effect. However, the request for change in date of birth received earlier and referred to RPFC-I of the Region should be decided by RPFC-I of the Region and not returned back to SROs undecided, to avoid further delay in such cases.

(This issues with the approval of CPFC.)

Yours faithfully

(MUKESH KUMAR)
Regional P.F. Commissioner -I (Pension)

Share

Recent Posts

  • GST

Merely for wrong PIN code of consignor/ consignee goods can’t be seized u/s 129(3)

If address of consignor or consignee is correct, merely for wrong PIN code, the proceedings u/s 129 can not be…

20 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Notice u/s 143(2) void if type of scrutiny not mentioned i.e. limited, complete or compulsory manual

Notice u/s 143(2) without specifying whether it is a limited scrutiny or a complete scrutiny or a compulsory manual scrutiny…

20 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Once unaccounted income is admitted & attains finality, no protective addition can be made

Once unaccounted income is admitted and issue attains finality, no addition can be made on a protective basis for the…

23 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Condonation of delay in filing Form 10B – ill-health of executive trustee, a bonafide reason

Condonation of delay in filing Form 10B/ITR. ill-health resulting in demise of executive trustee was a bonafide reason In a…

1 day ago
  • GST

Cancellation of GST registration would work against the interest of revenue – HC

Cancellation or Suspension of GST registration would be counterproductive and work against the interest of the revenue – HC In…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Validity of consolidated approval u/s 153D-ITAT Allahabad follows earlier decision over later one

ITAT Allahabad follows it previous decision on validity of consolidated approval u/s 153D, says it’s later decision was in violation…

2 days ago