Delinking of wrongly linked UANs – EPFO
Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation
Ministry of Labour & Employment, Govt. Of India
Bhavishya Nidhi Bhawan, 14-Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110066
No. R-I/P-20/UAN/2014/Vol. II/456 Dated: 24.08.2016
To
All Additional Central PF Commissioners (Political States),
All Regional PF Commissioners, In-charge of Regions,
All Officers in Charge, Sub-Regional Offices
Subject: Delinking of wrongly linked UANs-reg
Sir/Madam,
It has been informed by few employers, members and field offices that member IDs o members in some cases have been wrongly linked to UAN of other members. This has happened because of wrong approval by the employer . It has been requested to delink the member IDs from such wrongly linked UANs.
2. The matter has been examined and it has been decided that all such requests for the linking should be recommended by the concerned field office. The following points should be noted while sending the recommendations:
3. It may be noted that in the revised version of UAN & ECR to be commenced shortly, the UAN would have the member details linked to the latest member Id. Thus, it becomes very important that all such wrongly linked member Ids may be identified immediately by issuing appropriate communications to employers as the UAN data is to be migrated in the second fortnight of September, 2016. It is requested that all such requests should be forwarded with recommendations to Head Office by 02.09.2016.
Yours faithfully,
(Jag Mohan)
Additional Central P.F. Commissioner -I (IS)
No disallowance u/s 43B can be made if expenditure has not been not claimed by the assessee in Profit and…
Whether an assessee developing an infrastructure facility of Government is a contractor and ineligible for claim of deduction under Section…
Jurisdictional Principal Commissioner of Income-tax or Commissioner of Income-tax to condone delay in filing Form No. 10A for Registration u/s…
AO was not justified in making addition by adopting method of extrapolation without bringing any material evidence in support -…
Court can not sit over comparative financial attractiveness of rival offers or to substitute its own view for the decision…
When quantum appeal stands restored to the AO, penalty can not be levied u/s 221(1) of the Income Tax Act…