EPFO

EPS 95 benefit of actual salary exceeding wage limit-Petition filed to transfer all cases to SC

EPS 95 benefit of actual salary in Pension Fund exceeding wage limit as per SC order. Petition filed to transfer all cases to Supreme Court for decision 

Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation
Ministry of Labour & Employment, Government of India
Bhavishya Nidhi Bhawan
Bhikaiji Cama Place, New Delhi  110066
www .epfindia .gov .in
Phone No. 011-26196236, Fax. 011-26168431, Email- rc.pension@epfindia.gov.in

No: Pension-1/12/33/E PS/Amendment/96 Vol.II/19214

Dated: 29 NOV 2017

To
All Additional Central P.F. Commissioners (Zones) ,
All Regional P.F. Commissioner (In-Charge of Regions)

Subjcct :- AIIowing members of the EPS’95 the benefit of the actual salary in the Pension Fund exceeding wage limit of either Rs. 5000/- or Rs. 6500/- per month from the effective date respectively as per the Hon’ble Supreme Court’s order in Civil Appeal No(s) 10013-10014 of 2016 arising out of SLP No. 33032-33033 of 2015 -regarding.

Sir/Madam

It has been brought to the notice that Writ Petitions have been filed in different High Courts by the employees of exempted establishments challenging the circular dated 31-05-2017. In this connection it is informed that a Transfer Petition has been filed in the Hon’ble Supreme Court to transfer all the Writ Petitions filed in various High Courts to the Supreme Court for deciding the subject matter.

Therefore, it is requested to place this fact before the Hon’ble High Court where such petitions have been filed and to defend the matter based on the directions already passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court as cited above.

(This issues with the approval of CPFC)

 

Yours faithfully,

(Mukesh Kumar)
Regional PF Commissioner- I (Pension)

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

AO not justified in rejecting registered valuer’s report without reference to DVO – ITAT

AO not justified in rejecting registered valuer’s report without making a reference to the DVO - ITAT In a recent…

2 hours ago
  • FCRA

FCRA specifies list of 105 purposes to be selected for which registration is applied

FCRA specifies list of purposes to be selected for which registration is applied.  The Ministry of Home Affairs has notified…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Withholding tax u/s 40(a)(i) not required on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent company

Assessee was not liable to withhold tax at source u/s 40(a)(i) on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent company In a…

3 days ago
  • Government

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App not disproportionate – Delhi High Court

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App under section 69A of IT Act 2000 is not disproportionate - Delhi HC…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA to means a project or an undertaking owned…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash not owner who came up to own it

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash…

1 week ago