No need to affix Rs one Revenue Stamp on PF claim forms in case of payments through NEFT-EPFO
Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation
(Ministry of Labour, Govt. Of India)
No. Exem/Misc./CBT-ltem/2013/Vol-II/32894 Dated: 07 MAR 2017
To
The All Addl. Central P. F. Commissioner (Zones),
The All Regional P.F. Commissioners -lncharge,
Regional Offices/Sub Regional Offices .
Subject: Dispensing with the procedure of affixing of Rs. 1/- Revenue Stamp on claim forms in case of payments through NEFT – regarding.
Sir,
Please refer to this office circular No. WSU/Ciaim Form/Revenue Stamp/9962 dated 18.08.2015 whereby the necessary instructions in the matter regarding dispensing with the procedure of affixing of rs. 1/- revenue stamp on claim forms in case of payments through National Electronic Fund Transfer (NEFT) was communicated (copy enclosed).
2. It is observed that even though EPFO has stopped the use of revenue stamp on claim forms, in case the claim amount is to be paid through NEFT but found that some P.F exempted establishments continue to insist on You are therefore requested to inform the employer of exempted establishments on the step being taken to simplify the settlement of claims and ensure that instructions issued by Head Office vide circular dated 18.08.2015 should follow strictly.
Yours faithfully
(K. L. Goyal)
Addl. Central P.F. Commissioner (Exemption)
Ph: -011-26170928
Denying the accumulation of u/s 11(2) merely on grounds of a procedural delay in filing Form No. 10 is unsustainable…
Engagement of 05 Young Professionals CAs in the Office of Central Registrar of Cooperative Society on contractual basis The office…
Immunity u/s 270AA(2) in respect of a single transaction can not be denied to one assessee when the penalty was…
ITAT deleted addition u/s 69A towards jewellery found in search in view of Indian traditions, CBDT Instruction and High Court…
Documents obtained post search and information obtained from the public domain not incriminating material. Documents obtained by AO post search…
Information of deposits in bank did not constitute fresh information necessitating second reopening due to change in bank name In…