EPFO

No need to affix Rs one Revenue Stamp on PF claim forms in case of payments through NEF -EPFO

No need to affix Rs one Revenue Stamp on PF claim forms in case of payments through NEFT-EPFO

Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation
(Ministry of Labour, Govt. Of India)

No. Exem/Misc./CBT-ltem/2013/Vol-II/32894                                                                          Dated: 07 MAR 2017

To    
The All Addl. Central P. F. Commissioner (Zones),
The All Regional P.F. Commissioners -lncharge,
Regional Offices/Sub Regional Offices .

 

Subject: Dispensing with the procedure of affixing of Rs. 1/- Revenue Stamp on claim forms in case of payments through NEFT – regarding.

Sir,

Please refer to this office circular No. WSU/Ciaim Form/Revenue Stamp/9962 dated 18.08.2015 whereby the necessary instructions in the matter regarding dispensing with the procedure of affixing of rs. 1/- revenue stamp on claim forms in case of payments through National Electronic Fund Transfer (NEFT) was communicated (copy enclosed).

2. It is observed that even though EPFO has stopped the use of revenue stamp on claim forms, in case the claim amount is to be paid through NEFT but found that some P.F exempted establishments continue to insist on You are therefore requested to inform the employer of exempted establishments on the step being taken to simplify the settlement of claims and ensure that instructions issued by Head Office vide circular dated 18.08.2015 should follow strictly.

Yours faithfully

 

(K. L. Goyal)
Addl. Central P.F. Commissioner (Exemption)
Ph: -011-26170928

Share

Recent Posts

  • Government

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App not disproportionate – Delhi High Court

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App under section 69A of IT Act 2000 is not disproportionate - Delhi HC…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA to means a project or an undertaking owned…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash not owner who came up to own it

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash…

4 days ago
  • RTI

Lokayukta Police not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005 – SC

Lokayukta Police not an ‘intelligence and security’ organisation  and hence not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST – case remanded for determination In a recent…

1 week ago
  • ICAI

CA Misconduct – Order quashed as judgment not passed by same members who heard arguments.

CA Misconduct – Appellate order quashed as final judgment was not passed by same members who heard arguments. In a…

2 weeks ago