EPFO

EPFO-Reporting exact numbers of employees on inspection made mandatory in case of all security/ manpower/ facility management establishments

EPFO-Reporting exact numbers of employees on inspection made mandatory 

Employee Provident Fund Organisation

No. Compliance/C-III/011/3(18)2015/DL/DO-Ref/8654

dt. 1 Aug. 2016 

To
All Additional Central PF Commissioners
All Regional PF Commissioners-I
All Regional PF Commissioners-II
All Assistant PF Commissioners,

Sub: Inspection of Security/Manpower/Facility Management Establishments.

Large number of establishments engaged in providing security services, supply of manpower, facility management establishments and construction companies are covered under EPF & MP act 1952. Several complaints are received regarding under-reporting of employees/ contribution under the act in respect of such establishments. Often, the nature of such complaints is that these establishments have not enrolled all of the employees deployed with different principal employer/ clients.

2. In this regard, it is observed that while inspecting compliance of such establishments/ companies under EPF & MP Act, 1952 only absolute number of employees are reported by field officers and this may not give correct picture about number of employees engaged.

3. Hence, it has been decided that from now onwards

(a) it shall be mandatory on the part of Enforcement Officers, to report numbers of employees in respect of these security/ manpower/ facility management establishments with reference to each of principal employer/ clients being served by these establishments, and

(b) In case of any 7A proceeding, in respect of such establishments, it shall be mandatory on the part of officers working as Departmental Representatives to report numbers of employees in respect of these security/ manpower/ facility management establishments with reference to each of the principal employers/ clients being served by these establishments.

4. Further, while carrying out inspection of principal employers it must be ascertained whether the details of contract awarded have been uploaded by the principal employer in the EPF portal and the same should be reported in the inspection report. The Inspection Proforma (Unexempted Establishments) has accordingly been modified with the inclusion of live items 2A & 7A in the proforma. A copy of the modified Inspection Proforma is enclosed for ensuring that all future inspections are firstly, carried out keeping the instructions in the circular in view, and secondly duly reported in the revised proforma.

Yours Faithfully

(M. Narayanappa)
Additional Central Provident Fund Commissioner-I

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Later SC ruling cannot render an act done in compliance of a court order a statutory default

A subsequent Apex Court ruling on the substantive issue cannot retrospectively make an act done in compliance of a binding…

10 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Interest payment on mobilisation advance to NHAI not liable to TDS u/s 194A

Interest payment on mobilisation advance to NHAI not liable for deduction of tax at source u/s 194A - ITAT Interest…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Typographical error in turnover accepted during assessment not a mistake apparent from record

Typographical error in turnover declared in ITR was not as a mistake apparent from the record u/s 154 when AO…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Plea that assessee was not aware of order cannot be brushed aside in absence of proof of service

Ground taken by assessee that he was not aware of the order cannot be brushed aside so lightly in absence…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Order rejecting stay of income tax demand should recite merits if it is a case for stay or not

In an order rejecting stay of income tax demand there should be a recital of the merits whether it is…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

CBDT extends due date of tax audit for FY 2025-26 to 21st October 2026

CBDT has extended the due date for furnishing Return of Income for Assessment Year 2026-27 (FY 2025-26) in respect of…

1 week ago