EPFO

There is no provision for conversion of disablement pension. Benefits can not be allowed beyond Rules

There is no provision for conversion of disablement pension. Pension Schemes benefits can not be allowed beyond Rules by taking a so called “lenient and liberal view.

National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, New Delhi has allowed an important Revision Petition filed by the Provident Fund Office, Kannur against the order passed by the Consumer District Forum, Kannur as well as State Commission, Thiruvananthapuram.

The complainant was an employee of a cooperative society and was a member of EPF having more than 20 years of service. The Society discontinued his services on medical grounds. Thereafter the complainant filed an application for provident fund benefits and for disablement pension which was rejected by the said Cooperative Society.

The District Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum, Kannur allowed the compliant and directed the Cooperative Society to reconsider the matter and give disablement pension to the complianant.

The State Commission also confirmed the order of the District Forum.

The National Commission has allowed the revision Petition filed by the PF Office with the observation that there is no provision for conversion of disablement pension under Rule 15 to avail of reduced pensionunder Rule 12.The EPF Scheme 1995 and all other pension Schemes are to benefit the employees, however these benefits can not be claimed and allowed beyond the Rules in violation of the said Rules by taking a so called “lenient and liberal view.”

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

11 hours ago
  • ICAI

Last date to submit MEF 2026-27 extended to 09.09.2026

ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…

13 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

4 days ago