Excise/Custom

Assessment of Bill of Entry at different Customs station-Functions increased for Superintendent

Assessment of Bill of Entry for imports made at a different Customs station-Functions increased for Superintendent of Customs

MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
(CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS)

Notification No. 96 /2020-Customs (N.T.) 

New Delhi, the 12th October , 2020

G.S.R. 629(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 4 and sub-section (1) of section 5, read with sub-section (34) of section 2 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962), the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs hereby, makes the following amendments in the Notification of the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, (Department of Revenue) No.50/2020-Customs (N.T.) dated the 5th of June, 2020, published in the Gazette of India Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, sub-section (i) vide number G.S.R. 352(E) dated 5th June, 2020, namely :-

1. In the said notification, in the Table,-

i. against serial number 1, in column (3), after item (a), the following item shall be inserted, namely :-

“(b) Section 149 (before grant of order for clearance of goods under section 47 or section 68 of the Customs Act, 1962 or before grant of order permitting removal under Section 60 of the Customs Act, 1962, as the case may be) ;”.

2. This notification shall come into force on the date of publication in the Official Gazette.

[F. No 450/26/2019-Cus. IV (Pt)]

ANANTH RATHAKRISHNAN, Dy. Secy. (Customs)

Note: The principal notification number 50/2020-Customs (N.T.), dated the 5th of June, 2020, published in the Gazette of India Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, sub-section (i) vide number G.S.R. 352(E) dated the 5th of June, 2020.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

4 days ago
  • GST

A bland statement of ‘fraud or concealment of facts” in GST Notice u/s 74 not sufficient – SC

In GST Notice u/s 74, allegations should emanate from itself, a bland statement of ‘fraud or concealment of facts” not…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

For claiming deduction u/s 57(iii), test is of purpose and connection, not actual yield – ITAT

For claiming deduction u/s 57(iii) a reasonable and intelligible nexus should be established between the expenditure incurred and the income…

6 days ago