Excise/Custom

CBIC Extends time limit for filing of Monthly Return Form ER-1 and ER-2 for April 2019

CBIC Extends time limit for filing of Monthly Return Form ER-1 and ER-2 for April 2019 related to production and removal of goods and CENVAT credit

F. No. 267/58/2019/CX-8

Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs

New Delhi, Dated, the 8th May, 2019

Order No.:- 01/2019 Central Excise

Subject: – Extension of time limit for filing of Monthly Return for production and removal of goods and other relevant particulars and CENVAT credit specif ied in Form ER-1 and specified in ER-2 reg.

WHEREAS the migration and integration of legacy data from www.aces.gov.in to www.cbic-gst.gov.in is taking place, the  ACES application will remain disabled. To provide adequate window to the taxpayers to file prescribed returns, it has been decided to extend the e­ filing time limits for filing such returns due in April 2019.

2. NOW THEREFORE, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-rule (6) of rule 12 read with sub-rule (3) of rule 23 of the Central Excise Rules 2017 and sub rule 5 of rule 11 of CENVAT Credit Rule, 2017, the abcaus.in period for filing of ER-1/ER-2 returns for the month specified below in columns 3 is extended the date mention in column 5.

S.
No.

Details of return month

current date of filing return

Extended date of filing return
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
1. ER-1 April-2019 10 May 2019 10-June-2019
2. ER-2 April-2019 10 May 2019 10-June-2019

(V. Usha)
Pr. Commissioner (CX)

Download CBIC Order Click Here >>

----------- Similar Posts: -----------
Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Jewellery purportedly received from grandparent under Will added as unexplained credits

Addition u/s 68 for jewellery purportedly received on death of grandparent under Will upheld. In a recent judgment, ITAT upheld…

24 hours ago
  • bankruptcy

SC lays down tests to determine if a debt is financial debt or operational under IBC

Supreme Court lays down tests to determine whether a debt is a financial debt or an operational debt under IBC…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Commonality of directors of companies does not mean deposits received was bogus

Merely because directors of two companies were common not mean that deposits received was bogus and companies were shell companies…

2 days ago
  • ITAT

Application though named as rectification but if tax is not legitimate, it also touches merit: HC

Application though named as rectification but if tax imposed is not legitimate then it also touches upon the merit –…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cost of acquisition as on 01.04.1981 taken as per valuer report by reverse indexing of FMV

Cost of acquisition as on 01.04.1981 taken as per valuer report by reverse indexing of current FMV to be further…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

AO was directed to serve notice of hearing through physical mode upon assessee 

ITAT directed AO to serve notice of hearing both through electronic and physical mode upon the assessee  In a recent…

2 days ago