Excise/Custom

CBIC Extends time limit for filing of Monthly Return Form ER-1 and ER-2 for April 2019

CBIC Extends time limit for filing of Monthly Return Form ER-1 and ER-2 for April 2019 related to production and removal of goods and CENVAT credit

F. No. 267/58/2019/CX-8

Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs

New Delhi, Dated, the 8th May, 2019

Order No.:- 01/2019 Central Excise

Subject: – Extension of time limit for filing of Monthly Return for production and removal of goods and other relevant particulars and CENVAT credit specif ied in Form ER-1 and specified in ER-2 reg.

WHEREAS the migration and integration of legacy data from www.aces.gov.in to www.cbic-gst.gov.in is taking place, the  ACES application will remain disabled. To provide adequate window to the taxpayers to file prescribed returns, it has been decided to extend the e­ filing time limits for filing such returns due in April 2019.

2. NOW THEREFORE, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-rule (6) of rule 12 read with sub-rule (3) of rule 23 of the Central Excise Rules 2017 and sub rule 5 of rule 11 of CENVAT Credit Rule, 2017, the abcaus.in period for filing of ER-1/ER-2 returns for the month specified below in columns 3 is extended the date mention in column 5.

S.
No.

Details of return month

current date of filing return

Extended date of filing return
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
1. ER-1 April-2019 10 May 2019 10-June-2019
2. ER-2 April-2019 10 May 2019 10-June-2019

(V. Usha)
Pr. Commissioner (CX)

Download CBIC Order Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

4 days ago
  • GST

A bland statement of ‘fraud or concealment of facts” in GST Notice u/s 74 not sufficient – SC

In GST Notice u/s 74, allegations should emanate from itself, a bland statement of ‘fraud or concealment of facts” not…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

For claiming deduction u/s 57(iii), test is of purpose and connection, not actual yield – ITAT

For claiming deduction u/s 57(iii) a reasonable and intelligible nexus should be established between the expenditure incurred and the income…

6 days ago