Excise/Custom

CBIC Extends time limit for filing of Monthly Return Form ER-1 and ER-2 for April 2019

CBIC Extends time limit for filing of Monthly Return Form ER-1 and ER-2 for April 2019 related to production and removal of goods and CENVAT credit

F. No. 267/58/2019/CX-8

Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs

New Delhi, Dated, the 8th May, 2019

Order No.:- 01/2019 Central Excise

Subject: – Extension of time limit for filing of Monthly Return for production and removal of goods and other relevant particulars and CENVAT credit specif ied in Form ER-1 and specified in ER-2 reg.

WHEREAS the migration and integration of legacy data from www.aces.gov.in to www.cbic-gst.gov.in is taking place, the  ACES application will remain disabled. To provide adequate window to the taxpayers to file prescribed returns, it has been decided to extend the e­ filing time limits for filing such returns due in April 2019.

2. NOW THEREFORE, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-rule (6) of rule 12 read with sub-rule (3) of rule 23 of the Central Excise Rules 2017 and sub rule 5 of rule 11 of CENVAT Credit Rule, 2017, the abcaus.in period for filing of ER-1/ER-2 returns for the month specified below in columns 3 is extended the date mention in column 5.

S.
No.

Details of return month

current date of filing return

Extended date of filing return
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
1. ER-1 April-2019 10 May 2019 10-June-2019
2. ER-2 April-2019 10 May 2019 10-June-2019

(V. Usha)
Pr. Commissioner (CX)

Download CBIC Order Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

AO took a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat was 25 lakh – ITAT

Assessing Officer had taken a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat/text message was 25 lakh - ITAT…

7 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Shareholders can’t be taxed for income from properties owned by the company – HC

Shareholders are only owners of the shares of the company therefore, income from properties earned by the company cannot be…

9 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Jurisdictional error in reassessment approval can’t be shielded by the law of limitation

When approval for reassessment was granted by unauthorised authority, such jurisdictional error cannot be shielded by the law of limitation…

12 hours ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT ought to remanded whole matter of bogus purchases instead of profit determination

ITAT on presumption of bogus purchases ought to have remanded case to AO to reconsider the whole matter instead of…

12 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Where proceedings u/s 153C barred by limitation, AO can’t invoke section 148 & 148A

Where proceedings u/s 153C are barred by limitation, AO can not reopen the case invoking section 148 and 148A of…

1 day ago
  • bankruptcy

Corporate guarantees executed by corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC

Corporate guarantees executed by the corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC and banks to be recognized as financial creditors…

1 day ago