Excise/Custom

Ex Commissioner of central excise sentenced to rigorous imprisonment of two years for illegal gratification

Ex commissioner of central excise sentenced to rigorous imprisonment of two years for demanding and accepting illegal gratification of Rs. 15 lakhs

As per press release issued by the CBI, the Additional Special Judge for CBI Cases, Visakhapatnam has convicted Sh. Surender Pal Singh @ S.P.Singh(an IRS officer of 1973 batch), the then Commissioner, Central Excise, Port Area, Visakhapatnam and sentenced him to undergo two years Rigorous Imprisonment with a fine of Rs.20,000/- in a CBI case.

CBI had registered this case on 09.03.2001 U/s 120-B of IPC and Sec.8, 10 & 13(2) r/w. 13(1)(d) of PC Act, 1988 against Sh. S.P. Singh, Commissioner, Central Excise, Visakhapatnam; one private person of a Hyderabad based private company; a businessman of New Delhi and unknown others.

It was alleged that during the year 2001, Sh. S.P.Singh, the then Commissioner of Central Excise, Visakhapatam entered into a criminal conspiracy with three private persons including businessman and abused his official position in the matter of adjudication of the evasion of Excise Duty to the tune of Rs. 4.88 crore (approx) by Andhra Pradesh based private companies(all these were sister concerns).

Initially, Sh. S.P.Singh directed a businessman of Delhi to collect the amount of Rs. 25 lakh from the private person of Hyderabad on 09-03-2001 at Hyderabad. Subsequently, Sri S.P. Singh reduced the amount to Rs 15 lakh.

In furtherance of the said criminal conspiracy, the businessman of New Delhi in turn directed two other private persons to visit Hyderabad and accept the illegal gratification of Rs.15 lakh on behalf of said Commissioner from the private person of Hyderabad based company.

The private persons visited Hyderabad on 09-03-2001 and allegedly accepted illegal gratification of Rs.15 lakh on behalf of Sh. S.P.Singh from the private person of said Hyderabad based company. CBI laid a trap and caught the accused persons.

Searches were conducted at the premises of accused persons which led to reovery of documents consisting of shares, one locker key, Cash of Rs.1,40,000/-, US Dollars 1019, Singapore Dollars 95, documents of immovable & movable properties and other incriminating documents.

After thorough investigation, CBI filed a chargesheet on 29.07.2004 in the Court of Additional Special Judge for CBI Cases, Visakhapatnam against Sh. Surender Pal Singh @ S.P.Sisngh, the then Commissioner, Central Excise, Port Area, Visakhapatnam and three private persons including a businessman.

The Trial Court found the then Commissioner of Central Excise guilty and convicted him. The other three persons were acquitted.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Exemption u/s 54 allowed despite failure to deposit in Capital Gains Accounts Scheme

ITAT allows exemption u/s 54 allowed despite failure to deposit the amount in Capital Gains Accounts Scheme and new asset…

9 hours ago
  • Income Tax

No addition to be made in hands of assessee solely on basis of uncorroborated loose-sheet

Addition cannot be made in the hands of the assessee solely on the basis of uncorroborated loose-sheet - ITAT In…

14 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Claim of Leave Encashment exemption u/s 10(10AA)(ii) dismissed beyond Rs. 3 lakhs

ITAT dismisses claim of Leave Encashment exemption u/s 10(10AA)(ii) beyond Rs. 3 lakhs In a recent judgment, ITAT Ahmedabad has…

20 hours ago
  • Income Tax

AO took a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat was 25 lakh – ITAT

Assessing Officer had taken a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat/text message was 25 lakh - ITAT…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Shareholders can’t be taxed for income from properties owned by the company – HC

Shareholders are only owners of the shares of the company therefore, income from properties earned by the company cannot be…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Jurisdictional error in reassessment approval can’t be shielded by the law of limitation

When approval for reassessment was granted by unauthorised authority, such jurisdictional error cannot be shielded by the law of limitation…

2 days ago