Excise First Stage Dealer and Importer common registration-return
Circular No. 1032/20120 16-CX
F.N0.20 1104/2016-CX-6
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
CENTRAL BOARD OF EXCISE & CUSTOMS
New Delhi, dated the 28th June, 2016
To
Principal Chief Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax (All)
Principal Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax (holding charge of Chief Commissioner) (All)
Web Master, CBEC
Madam/Sir ,
Sub: Common registration and return for First Stage Dealer and Importer- reg.
Attention is invited to Notifications No. 30/20 16-C.E.NT dated 28’11 June, 2016 by which it has been provided that an assessee who is registered as a First Stage Dealer shall be exempted from taking registration as an importer and vice-versa.
2.1 An assessee who conducts business both as an importer and a First Stage Dealer may take only one registration as he has been exempted from the requirement of taking a second registration. It may be noted that the facility is optional and any assessee needing separate registration for his own business purposes, may so register.
2.2 Such assessee who conducts business both as a First Stage Dealer and an Importer, henceforth shall also have the option of liling a single quarterly return giving details of transactions as a first stage dealer and an importer, one after the other in the same table of the return, viz., all transactions as first stage dealer during the return period shall be followed by all transactions as an importer during the same return period.
3. Difficulty experienced. if any, in implementing the circular should be brought to the notice of the Board. Hindi version would follow.
Yours faithfully,
(Shankar Prasad Sanna)
Under Secretary
There is no statutory requirement of pre-deposit for stay of demand under Income Tax Act - High Court stayed demand …
Engagement of Company Secretaries (CS) as Young Professionals in the Office of Regional Director (WR), Registrar of Companies, Mumbai and…
Applicability of provisions of Section 115BBE read with Section 69, 69A and 69C in a case arising before Settlement Commission…
Addition u/s 68 for jewellery purportedly received on death of grandparent under Will upheld. In a recent judgment, ITAT upheld…
Supreme Court lays down tests to determine whether a debt is a financial debt or an operational debt under IBC…
Merely because directors of two companies were common not mean that deposits received was bogus and companies were shell companies…