Powers of adjudication of Customs officers-revision of SCNs by corrigenda to make it answerable to the authority given in circular 16/2018-customs
Circular No. 17/2018-Customs
F.No.450/117/2009-Cus.IV
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
(Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs)
North Block, New Delhi
Dated 13th June, 2018.
To,
All Principal Chief Commissioners/ Chief Commissioners of Customs / Customs (Preventive)/ GST
All Principal Chief Commissioners/ Chief Commissioners of Customs & Central Taxes
All Commissioners of Customs (Appeals).
Sir / Madam,
Please refer Board’s Circular No. 16/2018-Customs dated 08.06.2018 specifying monetary limits for adjudication by various ranks in cases liable to confiscation under Chapter XIV of the Customs Act, 1962.
2. References have been received that due to issuance of the said Circular, the SCNs issued previously would need to be amended in terms of the revised adjudication powers prescribed in the said Circular. This exercise would delay the adjudication proceedings.
3. The matter has been examined. It is observed that SCNs issued for adjudication of cases falling under Chapter XIV [Section 122 (a)] are answerable to Principal Commissioner/Commissioner/ Joint Commissioner of Customs without value limits. Board has in the past vide Circular No. 3/2007-Cus., dated 10-1-2007 indicated a time frame of one year, from the date of service of the show cause notice, for adjudication in respect of cases within the competence of Commissioner of Customs or an Addl./ Joint Commissioner of Customs.
4. In pursuance of the circular 16/2018-customs, the immediate implication would be to issue corrigenda so as to make the SCNs answerable to the authority given in the said Circular.
This would delay the adjudication proceedings. Board desires that adjudication of causes should not be delayed. It has been therefore, decided to withdraw the instructions in the Board’s Circular No. 16/2018- Customs dated 08.06.2018.
5. Difficulty faced, if any, may be brought to the notice of the Board.
Yours faithfully,
(Zubair Riaz)
Director (Customs)
Download Circular Click Here >>
First-time experience in filing appeal was a reasonable and bona fide cause for delay – ITAT condoned delay In a…
Mere nondisclosure of place of destination in the documents cannot be a ground for seizure u/s 129 of GST Act.…
Imposition of exorbitant interest in contemporary commercial practices not against the fundamental policy of Indian Law, or against the morality…
Assessees was not required to prove the “source of the source‟ of funds received as unsecured loans Prior to the…
The contention that during the pendency of case before settlement commission, the assessee must give up his right to contest…
Entire amount of undisclosed money cannot be treated as income and only estimated profit embedded in these transactions may only…