Bank charges levied by SBI beyond free transaction limits based on monthly average balance(MAB) in savings bank account. No limit for MAB of Rs. 1 Lakhs
Press Information Bureau
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
18-July-2017
State Bank of India (SBI) has informed that the charges are levied by them beyond number of free transactions are as under:-
|
Monthly Average Balance in Savings Bank |
Monthly Limit on Number of free Debit transactions |
|||
| Branch | SBI ATMs | Other Bank ATMs | ||
| 6 Metros | Other Centres | |||
| <Rs.1000 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 5 |
| >1000 upto Rs.25,000 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 5 |
| >25,000 upto Rs.50,000 | 10 |
Unlimited |
3 | 5 |
| >50,000 upto Rs.1,00,000 | 15 | 3 | 5 | |
| >1,00,000 | Unlimited | Unlimited | ||
SBI has informed that the charges for cash withdrawal at branches beyond the permitted free withdrawals are Rs.50/- + Goods and Service Tax (GST) per transaction. With substantial investment in infrastructure and technology, cash outgo to other banks for ATM transactions and cost of servicing Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana (PMJDY) / Basic Savings Bank Deposit (BSBD) /Financial Inclusion (FI) accounts with RUPay Debit Card, it becomes imperative for the Bank to find a way out to recover at least a part of the cost. The charges are levied for the cost involved in handling the transaction and the attendant work.
Further, SBI has informed that the charges being levied for cash withdrawals at ATMs beyond the permitted free withdrawals are as under:
This Government has received some complaints from public including Hon’ble Members of Parliament regarding to impose penalties on customers for not keeping minimum balance by banks. Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has informed that terms and conditions for operating a saving bank account including minimum balance requirements are decided by Boards of individual bank. These are not fixed by RBI.
This was stated by Shri Santosh Kumar Gangwar, Minister of State for Finance in written reply to a question in Rajya Sabha today.
*****
DSM/SBS/KA
Assessing Officer had taken a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat/text message was 25 lakh - ITAT…
Shareholders are only owners of the shares of the company therefore, income from properties earned by the company cannot be…
When approval for reassessment was granted by unauthorised authority, such jurisdictional error cannot be shielded by the law of limitation…
ITAT on presumption of bogus purchases ought to have remanded case to AO to reconsider the whole matter instead of…
Where proceedings u/s 153C are barred by limitation, AO can not reopen the case invoking section 148 and 148A of…
Corporate guarantees executed by the corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC and banks to be recognized as financial creditors…