Finance Ministry

SIT directs Enforcement Directorate to take necessary action under FEMA against 216 and 572 Companies

SIT directs Enforcement Directorate to take necessary action under FEMA with respect to 216 Companies with respect to the period before 1st March, 2016 and 572 Companies for the period after 1st March, 2016 for which each such Company had export proceeds pending for realisation for more than Rs. 100 crore;

Minstry of Finance

SIT also directed Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) to check from it’s database on how many Companies have claimed duty drawback but have failed to bring export proceeds, take necessary action against them as per law; Asks  RBI to immediately develop an institutional mechanism and IT system to not only immediately red flag those cases where exports have been outstanding in violation of FEMA guidelines but share the complete data with Enforcement Directorate and Directorate of Revenue Intelligence on a monthly basis.

As per RBI regulations, all exporters have to bring foreign exchange into the country as export proceeds within one year of the date of exports. The data on whether a particular exporter has brought export proceeds into the country is maintained by RBI.

Not bringing export proceeds is a violation of Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) as it amounts to illicitly parking funds abroad.

Further, exporters can claim duty drawback on exports made with respect to taxes paid on inputs to exports. Any exporter can claim duty drawback only if the exporter has brought export proceeds into the country.

It is important for Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) also to have this data so that they could cross check the data and see if any exporter who has not brought in export proceeds has claimed duty drawback or not. The country thus loses on two counts – first by not getting proceeds of exports for exports made and secondly wrongful claim of duty drawback.

The Special Investigation Team (SIT) had asked RBI to give details of exports made where exports proceeds were yet to be utilised even after a period of more than one year. In response, RBI provided data on Export outstanding for shipping bills prior to 1st March, 2014 pending for more than one year as well as data on export outstanding for shipping bills on or after 1st March, 2014 pending for more than one year.

              The data was reviewed in SIT meeting held on 12th and 13th July, 2016. From the data provided by RBI, it emerged that huge amount of export proceeds have not been realized. The SIT directed as follows :

  • Enforcement Directorate to take necessary action under FEMA wherever needed and specially with respect to 216 Companies with respect to the period before 1st March, 2016 and 572 Companies for the period after 1st March, 2016 for which each such Company had export proceeds pending for realisation for more than Rs. 100 crores and inform SIT on action taken.
  • Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) to check from it’s database on how many Companies have claimed duty drawback but have failed to bring export proceeds, take necessary action against them as per law and inform SIT of action taken.
  • RBI may immediately develop an institutional mechanism and IT system to not only immediately red flag those cases where exports have been outstanding in violation of FEMA guidelines but share the complete data with Enforcement Directorate and Directorate of Revenue Intelligence on a monthly basis. 

******

DSM/AR
(Release ID :147444)

----------- Similar Posts: -----------
Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Jewellery purportedly received from grandparent under Will added as unexplained credits

Addition u/s 68 for jewellery purportedly received on death of grandparent under Will upheld. In a recent judgment, ITAT upheld…

7 hours ago
  • bankruptcy

SC lays down tests to determine if a debt is financial debt or operational under IBC

Supreme Court lays down tests to determine whether a debt is a financial debt or an operational debt under IBC…

10 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Commonality of directors of companies does not mean deposits received was bogus

Merely because directors of two companies were common not mean that deposits received was bogus and companies were shell companies…

1 day ago
  • ITAT

Application though named as rectification but if tax is not legitimate, it also touches merit: HC

Application though named as rectification but if tax imposed is not legitimate then it also touches upon the merit –…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Cost of acquisition as on 01.04.1981 taken as per valuer report by reverse indexing of FMV

Cost of acquisition as on 01.04.1981 taken as per valuer report by reverse indexing of current FMV to be further…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

AO was directed to serve notice of hearing through physical mode upon assessee 

ITAT directed AO to serve notice of hearing both through electronic and physical mode upon the assessee  In a recent…

2 days ago