Finance Ministry

Small Finance and Payment Banks – RBI Guidelines

Small Finance and Payment Banks – RBI Guidelines

Ministry of Finance

Dated: 17th March, 2017

Small Finance and Payment Banks
Reserve Bank of India (RBI) issued guidelines for licensing of small finance banks and payments banks on November 27, 2014 and granted in-principle approvals to 10 applicants to set up small finance banks and to 11 applicants to set up payments banks.

The guidelines for small finance banks provide inter-alia that (i) eligible promoters could be resident individuals/professionals with 10 years of banking and finance experience including companies controlled by them etc. (ii) shall primarily undertake basic banking activities of acceptance of deposits and lending to unserved and underserved sections (iii) The minimum paid-up equity capital for small finance banks shall be Rs. 100 crore and (iv) all prudential norms and regulations of RBI as applicable to existing commercial banks including requirement of maintenance of Cash Reserve Ratio (CRR) and Statutory Liquidity Ratio (SLR).

The guidelines for payment banks provide inter-alia that (i) eligible promoters can be non-bank Pre-paid Payment Instrument (PPI) issuers; and other entities like mobile telephone companies etc. (ii) shall primarily accept demand deposits upto maximum balance of Rs. 1,00,000 per individual customer. (iii) Issue ATM/debit cards, payments and remittance services. (iv) maintain CRR with the Reserve Bank on its outside demand and time liabilities and invest at least 75 per cent of its “demand deposit balances” in SLR eligible Government securities/treasury bills.

Licensed under Section 22 (1) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, Small Finance and Payment banks have to comply with all regulatory and supervisory frameworks that are applicable to commercial banks with suitable calibrations in view of the differentiated scope of such banks.

This was stated by Shri Santosh Kumar Gangwar, Minister of State in the Ministry of Finance in written reply to a question in Lok Sabha today.

Source: PIB
Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

No obligation to deduct TDS u/s 195 on payment to non-resident foreign commission agent

No obligation to deduct tax at source u/s 195 on the commission paid to non-resident foreign commission agent not liable…

14 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Deduction u/s 80P denied as return not filed u/s 139(1) but in response to notice u/s 148

Deduction u/s 80P denied as assessee did not file return u/s 139(1) but beyond the due date only in response…

2 days ago
  • GST

High Court denied pre-arrest bail to accused of fake ITC utilisation

High Court denied pre-arrest bail to accused of fake ITC utilisation on possibility of misusing the concession of pre arrest…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

ITR was not non est for no e-verification when AO took cognizance of returned income

Return could not be said to be non est for non e-verification when AO had been taken due cognizance of…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Section 43CB & ICDS-III is applicable to contractors not to real estate developers

Section 43CB read with ICDS-III is applicable to contractors and not real estate developers - ITAT In a recent judgment,…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Expenses of ESOP are allowable as revenue expenditure u/s 37(1) of Income Tax Act.

Expenses incurred on ESOP are allowable as revenue expenditure u/s 37(1) of Income Tax Act – ITAT Delhi In a…

4 days ago