Government

Repealing Obsolete and Redundant Laws-Press Release

Repealing Obsolete and Redundant Laws. Law Commission of India and Legislative Department had identified 1824 redundant/obsolete Central Acts for repealing

Press Release

18-January, 2017

Cabinet approves the repealing of the obsolete and redundant laws

The Union Cabinet chaired by the Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi has given its approval for introduction of the Repealing and Amending Bill, 2017 to repeal 105 Acts. 

Background:
The two Member Committee constituted by the PMO, the Law Commission of India and the Legislative Department identified 1824 redundant and obsolete Central Acts for repeal.  After careful examination and consultation with various Ministries/Departments in the Government of India, four Acts have been enacted to repeal 1175 Central Acts (during the period May, 2014 to August, 2016) by Parliament which are –

(i) The Repealing and Amending Act, 2015 (17 of 2015) repealing 35 Acts; The Repealing and Amending (Second) Act, 2015 (19 of 2015) repealing 90 Acts;

(ii) The Appropriation Acts (Repeal) Act, 2016 (22 of 2016) repealing 756;

(iii) Appropriation Acts including Appropriation (Railways) Acts;

(iv) The Repealing and Amending Act, 2016 (23 of 2016) repealing 294 Acts.

Out of the aforesaid 1824 Acts, 227 Acts (including Appropriation Acts enacted by Parliament for the States under President’s Rule) are identified to be repealed by State Governments have been requested to take necessary action to repeal them.

A list of remaining 422 Central Acts was circulated among all the Ministries/ Departments for their comments on repeal of Acts pertaining to their respective Ministries/Departments. Till date, 73 Ministries/Departments including Legislative Department have given their comments whereby they have agreed to repeal 105 Acts and disagreed to repeal about 139 Acts. On the basis of the comments/concurrence received from the Ministries/Departments, 105 Acts have been identified for repeal by this Department.

***

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

No addition when cash deposited in bank was available as cash in hand in the books

No addition when cash deposited in bank was out of cash in hand available with the assessee and AO could…

6 hours ago
  • arbitration

Use of word “can” in arbitration clause not a binding arbitration agreement –SC

Use of word “can” in arbitration clause cannot be said to be a binding arbitration agreement –Supreme Court In a…

7 hours ago
  • divorce

Loan repayments for assets acquisition not deductible for determining maintenance to wife

Repayments of loans taken for asset generation can’t be deducted  to arrive at earning capacity for determining maintenance to wife…

1 day ago
  • arbitration

Supreme Court explains distinction between seat and venue of arbitration

Seat of arbitration is governed by the agreement of the parties and not by the place of hearing or the…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Order u/s 263 enhancing disallowance quashed as CIT (A) has power of enhancements – ITAT

ITAT quashed order u/s 263 enhancing disallowance observing in appellate proceedings, CIT(A) has power of enhancements of income assessed, if…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Penalty section cannot be subject matter of revisionary jurisdiction under section 263

Section under which penalty should be initiated cannot be subject matter of revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 of Income Tax…

3 days ago