Due date for furnishing quarterly FORM GSTR-1 by taxpayers with turnover upto Rs.1.5 crore is 31st July 2018 for the period April-June 2018
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
(Department of Revenue)
Central Board of Excise and Customs
New Delhi, the 28th March, 2018
G.S.R……(E). – — In exercise of the powers conferred by section 148 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (12 of 2017) (hereafter in this notification referred to as the Act), the Central Government, on the recommendations of the Council, hereby notifies the registered persons having aggregate turnover of up to 1.5 crore rupees in the preceding financial year or the current financial year, as the class of registered persons who shall follow the special procedure as mentioned below for furnishing the details of outward supply of goods or services or both.
2. The said persons shall furnish the details of outward supply of goods or services or both in FORM GSTR-1 effected during the quarter April to June, 2018 till the 31st day of July, 2018.
3. The special procedure or extension of the time limit for furnishing the details or return, as the case may be, under sub-section (2) of section 38 and sub-section (1) of section 39 of the Act, for the months of April to June, 2018 shall be, subsequently, notified in the Official Gazette.
[F. No. 349/58/2017-GST (Pt.)]
(Ruchi Bisht)
Under Secretary to the Government of India
Download Notification Click Here >>
There is no statutory requirement of pre-deposit for stay of demand under Income Tax Act - High Court stayed demand …
Engagement of Company Secretaries (CS) as Young Professionals in the Office of Regional Director (WR), Registrar of Companies, Mumbai and…
Applicability of provisions of Section 115BBE read with Section 69, 69A and 69C in a case arising before Settlement Commission…
Addition u/s 68 for jewellery purportedly received on death of grandparent under Will upheld. In a recent judgment, ITAT upheld…
Supreme Court lays down tests to determine whether a debt is a financial debt or an operational debt under IBC…
Merely because directors of two companies were common not mean that deposits received was bogus and companies were shell companies…