GST

FAQ on RCM Suspension, GST on advance payments, GTA and TDS Provisions

FAQ on RCM Suspension GST on advance payments, GTA and TDS Provisions

Question 1. If reverse charge is suspended till 31.03.2018, will GTAs have to pay tax under forward charge from now on?

Ans: No, reverse charge is being suspended only for purchases made by registered persons from unregistered persons. Reverse charge liability as notified under section 9(3) of the CGST Act, 2017, will continue to be applicable.

Question 2. Is it correct that one does not need to pay GST on the advance amount received for any supply?

Ans: No, the correct position is that the liability to pay GST on supply of goods shall not arise at the time of receipt of advance. GST shall have to be paid when the supply of goods is made. Please note that this is only applicable for a registered person having turnover up to Rs. 15 crores. This is not applicable for supplies of services .

Question 3. Goods Transport Agencies are refusing to transport goods for unregistered persons saying that they will need to get registered if the consignee is unregistered. Is this correct?

Ans: No, supplies made by a GTA to an unregistered person havebeen exempted from GST. Therefore, a GTA will not need to get registered just because it is supplying GTA services to an unregistered person

Question 4. Can Government departments start deducting TDS from payments made to contractors?

Ans: No, the operationalization of TDS registration and collection under GST has been put on hold till 01.04.2018. 

Question 5. Do Government departments need to compulsorily register for complying with TDS provisions?

Ans: No, since the operationalization of TDS provisions has been put on hold till 01.04.2018, a government department need not compulsorily register just to deduct TDS. If the government department is otherwise liable to pay GST, then it should take registration

Share

Recent Posts

  • bankruptcy

Agreement validly terminated prior to CIRP not give any enforceable right to corporate debtor

Agreement validly terminated prior to initiation of CIRP did not constitute “assets” or “property” of the corporate debtor u/s 14…

8 hours ago
  • negotiable instrument act

SC explains jurisdiction of courts under NI Act for dishonour of account payee or bearer cheques

Supreme Court explains jurisdiction of courts under NI Act for dishonour of account payee or bearer cheques In a recent…

11 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Normal business advances adjusted against sale bills cannot be added u/s 68 of Income Tax Act

Advances received in normal course of business and adjusted against sale bills cannot be added u/s 68 of the Income…

12 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Faceless mechanism for reopening include Central & International Tax charges

Faceless mechanism for income escaping assessment would not exclude the Central charges and International Taxation charges from its application -…

14 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Ground not adjudicated by 1st appellate authority cannot be decided in 2nd appeal

Ground not adjudicated by first appellate authority or ground not originating from first appellate order cannot be decided in second…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

COVID-19 amounted to a force majeure event – HC directs condonation of delay in filing ITR

High Court directed ITD to consider condonation of delay in filing ITR for four years as the COVID-19 pandemic constituted…

1 day ago