GST intelligence enforcement action power-Both Central or State officers can take enforcement action in respect of the entire value chain
Central Board Of Excise & Customs (CBIC) has issued a clarification regarding ambiguity regarding initiation of enforcement action by the Central tax officers in case of taxpayer assigned to the State tax authority and v1ce versa.
It has been informed that GST Council in its 91h meeting held on 16.01.2017 had discussed and made recommendations regarding administrative division of taxpayers and concomitant issues. The recommendation in relation to cross-empowerment of both tax authorities for enforcement of intelligence based action is recorded at para 28 of Agenda note no. 3 in the minutes of the meeting which read s as follows:-
Accordingly it has been clarified that the officers of both Central tax and State tax are authorized to initiate intelligence based enforcement action on the entire taxpayer’s base irrespective of the administrative assignment of the taxpayer to any authority.
The authority which initiates such action is empowered to complete the entire process of investigation, issuance of Show Cause Notice (SCN), adjudication, recovery, filing of appeal etc. arising out of such action.
In other words, if an officer of the Central tax authority initiates intelligence based enforcement action against a taxpayer administratively assigned to State tax authority, the officers of Central tax authority would not transfer the said case to its State tax counterpart and would themselves take the case to its logical conclusion.
Similar position would remain in case of intelligence based enforcement action initiated by officers of State tax authorities against a taxpayer administratively assigned to the Central tax Authority.
It has been further clarified that GSTN is already making changes in the IT system in this regard.
----------- Similar Posts: -----------In absence of mala fide intention bank should not be treated as assessee in default for late deduction and deposit…
Whether bank account was fraudulently open in the name of assessee is question of fact. High Court declined to entertain…
SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of Chartered Accountant Firms for FY 2024-25 SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of CA Firms for FY…
Change in the constitution of Appellate Authority for CAs CSs and Cost Accountants In 2015, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs…
Trade Tax Department was unjustified in retaining refund beyond stipulated period and adjusting it against default notices issued subsequently. In…
Notice issued u/s 143(2) prior to filing of return of income by the assessee was invalid. Before filing ITR provisions…