GST

GST Late fee in Sep return is carry forward of late fee of August -Example and Calculations

GST Late fee being observed in September return is actually a carry forward of late fee of the return filed for the month of August.

Any late fee left unpaid from previous tax period will be carried forward to next tax period . The calculation is done as under:

(Day of filing of previous month’s return  minus day of submission of previous Month’s return ) x 2  Tax Head : CGST & SGST) x 100

For Example:

Return for the month of August was submitted on 22nd September but filed on 26th September. In this case, the system has worked out the late fee of Rs. 400/- (2 x 200/-) up to the date of submission. This late fee of Rs. 400/- is populated to table 6.1 of GSTR-3B for payment.

At the time of setting off the liability , payment of Rs. 400/- only will be accounted for.

Suppose, the tax payer does not file return on 22nd September (the day of submission) but comes to file the return on 26th September. Since, the return is filed on 26th September, the tax payer is liable to pay late fee for 6 days (26th September – 20th September) but the tax payer has paid late fee along with return for two days only i.e. the difference between the due date of filing and the date of submission.

Thus the tax payer   is liable to pay a late fee for six days (26 – 20) but he has paid late fee for two days only.

Therefore, the late fee of remaining four days (26 – 22) will be carried forward to the next month’s return i.e. September 2017.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Prima facie satisfaction u/s 148 can not be a non-existing or incorrect information

The prima facie satisfaction u/s 148 cannot be stretched to a non-existing information or incorrect information - ITAT In a…

24 hours ago
  • SEBI

Mutual Funds to value physical Gold and Silver by using the polled spot prices

Mutual Funds to value physical Gold and Silver by using the polled spot prices published by the recognized stock exchanges…

1 day ago
  • bankruptcy

SC allows simultaneous CIRP proceedings against principal debtor & corporate guarantor

Supreme Court allows simultaneous CIRP proceedings against principal debtor and its corporate guarantor, declines to frame any guidelines In a…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Merely because sales were declared for only one month, same cannot be treated as bogus

Merely because assessee had declared sales for only one month, the same cannot be treated as bogus on the basis…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT deleted addition as method of accounting had been accepted in earlier years

ITAT deleted addition as the method of accounting had been accepted by the department in earlier years and the entire…

3 days ago
  • Benami

Orders passed under Benami Act cannot be challenged under IBC 2016 – SC

Orders passed under Benami Act cannot be challenged under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - SC In a recent judgment,…

4 days ago