GST

ITC credit claim of more than Rs One crore to be verified

ITC credit claim of more than Rs One crore to be verified by matching credit claimed with closing balance in returns filed under earlier laws

MAHENDER SINGH
Special Secretary & Member

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF FINANCE / DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
CENTRAL BOARD OF EXCISE & CUSTOMS
NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110001
Tele : +91-11-23094828 Fax : +91-11-23092512

 D.O. F.No. 1(5)/DGGST/CGSTcredit/29/2017/624-647
Dated 11th September 2017

Dear Chief Commissioners

The ITC data for CGST claimed in TRANS-1 statement received from M/s GSTN revealed that so far, the registered persons have claimed over Rs. 65,000 Crores as CGST transitional credit. The carry forward of transitional credit is permitted only when such credit is also permissible under the GST law. The credit specifically excluded under section 17(5) of the CGST Act is not eligible to be carried forward. The possibility of claiming the ineligible credit due to mistake or confusion cannot be ruled out. The GST Council has also decided to permit one-time revision/correction of Trans-1. Accordingly, it is desired that the claims of ITC credit of more than Rs. One crore may be got verified in a time bound manner.

A list of assesses who have claimed more than one crore rupees as credit in their TRAN1 as received from GSTN is enclosed for examination and verification.

2. It is required that such credit be verified to ensure that only eligible credit is carried forward such verification may include:

1. Matching the credit claimed with closing balance in returns filed under the earlier laws.

2. Checking the eligibility of credit under GST regime.

3. It is desired that the same should be done at the earliest with regard to assesses under your jurisdiction and a report sent to this office by 20th September, 2017.

 

With Best Wishes

Your Sincerely

(Mahendra Singh)

Download Text of the Notice in PDF Format with List of Companies Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

12 hours ago
  • ICAI

Last date to submit MEF 2026-27 extended to 09.09.2026

ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…

14 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

4 days ago