Mistake in mentioning some digits of Truck number on E-way bill – High Court directs release of goods and vehicle on furnishing security and indemnity bond
ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2612 (2018) (11) HC
Lately, the Hon’ble Allahabad High Court had held that Seizure of goods for inadvertent mistake in two digits of truck number in e way bill was nothing but harassment of dealer.
In a recent judgment again the Petitioner had approached the Hon’ble High Court with similar grievance.
In the instant case, the goods and the vehicle carrying the goods had been detained under Section 129 (1) of the U.P. Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (the Act) and in pursuance of the notice issued under Section 129 (3) of the Act a penalty order had also been passed.
The petitioner had preferred a writ petition for a direction for release of the goods and the vehicle on the ground that one minor discrepancy of incorrectly mentioning some digits of the correct Truck number on the E-way bill was not sufficient to order for detention of the the goods and the vehicle.
The Hon’ble High Court directed the Authorities to file counter and allowed the petitioner to file rejoinder affidavit thereafter.
The Hon’ble High Court, also directed that in the meantime the ceased goods and the vehicle be released on petitioner’s furnishing security other than cash and bank guarantee and indemnity bond of the proposed amount of tax and the penalty imposed provided that the goods had not been confiscated pursuant to the penalty order.
Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App under section 69A of IT Act 2000 is not disproportionate - Delhi HC…
High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA to means a project or an undertaking owned…
Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash…
Lokayukta Police not an ‘intelligence and security’ organisation and hence not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005…
Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST – case remanded for determination In a recent…
CA Misconduct – Appellate order quashed as final judgment was not passed by same members who heard arguments. In a…