GST

Mistake in mentioning some digits of Truck number on E-way bill – HC directs release of goods and vehicle

Mistake in mentioning some digits of Truck number on E-way bill – High Court directs release of goods and vehicle on furnishing security and indemnity bond

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2612 (2018) (11) HC

Lately, the Hon’ble Allahabad High Court had held that Seizure of goods for inadvertent mistake in two digits of truck number in e way bill was nothing but harassment of dealer.

In a recent judgment again the Petitioner had approached the Hon’ble High Court with similar grievance. 

 In the instant case, the goods and the vehicle carrying the goods had been detained under Section 129 (1) of the U.P. Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (the Act) and in pursuance of the notice issued under Section 129 (3) of the Act a penalty order had also been passed.

The petitioner had preferred a writ petition for a direction for release of the goods and the vehicle on the ground that one minor discrepancy of incorrectly mentioning some digits of the correct Truck number on the E-way bill was not sufficient to order for detention of the the goods and the vehicle. 

The Hon’ble High Court directed the Authorities to file counter and allowed the petitioner to file rejoinder affidavit thereafter.

The Hon’ble High Court, also directed that in the meantime the ceased goods and the vehicle be released on petitioner’s furnishing security other than cash and bank guarantee and indemnity bond of the proposed amount of tax and the penalty imposed provided that the goods had not been confiscated pursuant to the penalty order.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

----------- Similar Posts: -----------
Share

Recent Posts

  • Companies Act

Change in the constitution of Appellate Authority for CAs CSs and Cost Accountants

Change in the constitution of Appellate Authority for CAs CSs and Cost Accountants In 2015, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs…

8 hours ago
  • VAT

Trade Tax refund withheld beyond stipulated period & adjusted from demand unjustified – SC

Trade Tax Department was unjustified in retaining refund beyond stipulated period and adjusting it against default notices issued subsequently. In…

9 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Notice issued u/s 143(2) prior to filing of return of income assessee is invalid

Notice issued u/s 143(2) prior to filing of return of income by the assessee was invalid. Before filing ITR provisions…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Order u/s 148A(d) passed against non-existent entity is bad in eyes of law – High Court

Order u/s 148A(d) passed against non-existent entity is bad in eyes of law. Mere activation of PAN not give right…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Tax authorities not bound with provisions of section 44AE once assessee waived option

Tax authorities not bound with provisions of section 44AE of the Act once assessee waived the option available In a…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Whether seized document is incriminating or not is a findings of fact – High Court

Whether seized document is incriminating or not is definitely a findings of fact – High Court In a recent judgment,…

2 days ago