GST

Who is “owner of the goods” under GST for detention, seizure and release

Who is owner of the goods u/s 129(1) of CGST Act – CBIC Clarification 

Under section 129(1) of the CGST Act, where any person transports any goods or stores any goods while they are in transit in contravention of the GST provisions, all such goods and conveyance used as a means of transport for carrying the said goods and documents relating to such goods and conveyance is liable to detention or seizure.

The section also provide for the release of the goods after detention or seizure, on payment of tax and penalty in cases where either the  owner of the goods comes forward for payment of such tax and penalty or where the owner of the goods does not come forward for payment of such tax and penalty.

The CBIC has issued Circular No. 76/50/2018-GST clarifying certain issues related to GST.

The following clarification has been given on the question as to who us the deemed owner u/s 129(1):

Question:

Who will be considered as the “owner of the goods” for the purposes of section 129(1) of the CGST Act?

Answer:

It is hereby clarified that if the invoice or any other specified document is accompanying the consignment of goods, then either the consignor or the consignee should be deemed to be the owner.

If the invoice or any other specified document is not accompanying the consignment of goods, then in such cases, the proper officer should determine who should be declared as the owner of the goods.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non issue of notice u/s 143(2) for even belated ITR filed u/s 148 makes assessment void ab initio

Non issuance of notice u/s 143(2) for return filed u/s 148 even though belatedly, makes the assessment framed bad in…

4 days ago
  • Insurance

Calculation of functional disability depends on victim’s earning capacity in open market – SC

Calculation of functional disability depends on assessing the victim’s earning capacity in the open, competitive market – Supreme Court In…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

Appeal against ITAT shall lie only before High Court within whose jurisdiction AO is situated

Appeal against every decision of ITAT shall lie only before the High Court within whose jurisdiction the Assessing Officer who…

6 days ago
  • Excise/Custom

SC recommends action against Customs Officer who relied upon AI generated fake case laws

Supreme Court recommends action against Commissioner of Customs who relied upon non-existent AI generated case laws. Supreme Court recommends action…

7 days ago
  • Income Tax

Non- payment of cost imposed can’t trigger automatic confirmation of an invalid exparte assessment.

ITAT power to pass such orders "as it thinks fit" implies a judicial discretion to be exercised within the parameters…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

2 weeks ago