Requirement of e-Way Bill for “Bill To Ship To” model of supplies-Finance Ministry has clarified the issue regarding “Bill To Ship To” for e-Way Bill under CGST Rules, 2017
A number of representations have been received seeking clarifications in relation to requirement of e-Way Bill for “Bill To Ship To” model of supplies. In a typical “Bill To Ship To” model of supply, there are three persons involved in a transaction, namely:
2. In this complete scenario two supplies are involved and accordingly two tax invoices are required to be issued:
3. Queries have been raised as to who would generate the e-Way Bill for the movement of goods which is taking place from ‘B’ to ‘C’ on behalf of ‘A’. It is clarified that as per the CGST Rules, 2017 either ‘A’ or ‘B’ can generate the e-Way Bill but it may be noted that only one e-Way Bill is required to be generated as per the following procedure:
Case -1: Where e-Way Bill is generated by ‘B’, the following fields shall be filled in Part A of GST FORM EWB-01:
| 1. | Bill From: | In this field details of ‘B’ are supposed to be filled. |
| 2. | Dispatch From: | This is the place from where goods are actually dispatched. It may be the principal or additional place of business of ‘B’. |
| 3. | Bill To: | In this field details of ‘A’ are supposed to be filled. |
| 4. | Ship to: | In this field address of ‘C’ is supposed to be filled. |
| 5. | Invoice Details: | Details of Invoice-1 are supposed to be filled |
Case -2: Where e-Way Bill is generated by ‘A’, the following fields shall be filled in Part A of GST FORM EWB-01:
| 1. | Bill From: | In this field details of ‘A’ are supposed to be filled. |
| 2. | Dispatch From: | This is the place from where goods are actually dispatched. It may be the principal or additional place of business of ‘B’. |
| 3. | Bill To: | In this field details of ‘C’ are supposed to be filled. |
| 4. | Ship to: | In this field address of ‘C’ is supposed to be filled. |
| 5. | Invoice Details: | Details of Invoice-2 are supposed to be filled. |
Addition u/s 68 for jewellery purportedly received on death of grandparent under Will upheld. In a recent judgment, ITAT upheld…
Supreme Court lays down tests to determine whether a debt is a financial debt or an operational debt under IBC…
Merely because directors of two companies were common not mean that deposits received was bogus and companies were shell companies…
Application though named as rectification but if tax imposed is not legitimate then it also touches upon the merit –…
Cost of acquisition as on 01.04.1981 taken as per valuer report by reverse indexing of current FMV to be further…
ITAT directed AO to serve notice of hearing both through electronic and physical mode upon the assessee In a recent…